And the Banks Pushed Back…

When the property market headed in only one direction — up — it almost became a national obsession.

News bulletins reported weekend auction results, as if they were a sporting contest. Each monthly, quarterly and annual gain, further reason to celebrate.

Unlike a sporting contest, though, property owners were all on the same side. Cheering on as the median prices compounded year after year.

The only people not cheering were those still trying to get onto the property ladder. For many first homebuyers, that train felt like it had left the station a long time ago.

For them, each weekend is another disappointment. Investors and overseas buyers outbidding them at auctions.

With prices peaking in parts of Sydney and Melbourne in 2017, and softening since, a sudden burst of pragmatism has unfurled itself on the market.

All of a sudden, it is a ‘market’ again. Like any other market, driven by demand and supply.

After waiting so long to get their turn, and with fewer investors to compete against — first home buyers too are re-thinking things. What’s the point in buying, if the market could still have some way to fall?

And the reason for the fall?

Don’t blame interest rates

Normally, interest rates are to blame when property prices head south. With each rate move higher, more would-be buyers decide that they will sit on the sidelines. It also makes it tougher for those already in the market.

However, property investors can’t blame the RBA this time. The RBA cash rate has not budged in 31 months.

Sure, some banks have gently nudged their variable rates higher to reflect slightly higher funding costs. But that wasn’t enough to bring the property boom down.

This time, the banks are well and truly in the firing line. Not just from the royal commission, which highlighted plenty of bad deeds.

No, this time they stand accused of turning off the credit tap. By tightening up their lending criteria, it is supposedly the banks who put their needle in the bubble.

Last Friday, though, one of the Big Four pushed back. It was Brian Hartzer, CEO of Westpac — perhaps the bank that fared best in the commission — doing some pushing. Though, ever so subtly.

Appearing before a House of Representatives economic committee, The Australian reported that Mr Hartzer has a very different view about falling property prices. He stated it was:

‘…more to do with housing supply and demand factors than with banks’ tightening credit.’

From Westpac’s viewpoint, the falls comes from a market doing what it does. That is, adjusting itself between demand and supply.

He continued:

For Westpac, approval rates have been steady, and our risk appetite hasn’t changed significantly in the last 12 months.’

However, perhaps the most telling was what he said next (again reported by The Australian):

The bigger issue is that not as many people—particularly investors—are applying for loans.’

I guess you can’t put it any more simply than that. By his reckoning, normal market forces are now back at work.

Beware of the real cost

No doubt bank bashing is one of the easiest games in town. With populism now a mainstay of politics, banks will be too easy a target to ignore with an election just months away.

The opposition has already proffered to allocate $640 million to establish a Banking Fairness Fund. The money is destined to help fund financial rights lawyers and counsellors. More specifically, an extra 200 lawyers and another 500 counsellors.

It doesn’t take much of a guess to work out who will fund it. If elected, the current opposition will put a levy on the Big Four banks, plus other financial services companies inside the ASX 100 (like Suncorp, AMP and Macquarie Bank).

Good luck to any politician going into bat for a bank right now — particularly with an election so close. No hard hat will be hard enough.

Commissioner Hayne’s report highlighted the good work these lawyers and counselors do. Especially for those who can’t afford proper legal representation.

Either way, it is a cost the banks will have to absorb. And that means passing them on — via increased interest rates — to all those who own, or want to own, property.

Westpac argue that the supply of new homes already exceeds demand. Well intentioned, or pure politicking, a levy (and therefore higher interest rates) could do more damage than good. Meaning with even less buyers, property price falls could accelerate further.

All the best,

Matt Hibbard,
Editor, Options Trader


While many investors chase quick fire gains, Matt takes a different view. He is focused on two very clear goals. First: How to generate reliable and consistent income in a low-interest rate world. And second, how you can invest today to build wealth over the next 10–15 years. Matt researches income investments. You can find more of Matt’s work over at Total Income, where he is hunting down the next generation of dividend-paying companies for the future. He is also the editor of Options Trader, where he uses basic options strategies to generate additional streams of income beyond the regular dividend payments. Having worked for himself and with global firms for almost three decades, Matt has traded nearly every asset in existence. But now he is on a very different mission — to help investors generate income irrespective of what the market is doing. It’s about getting companies to pay you a steady, stable income, with minimal stress and the least risk possible. Matt doesn’t believe you have the luxury of being a bull or a bear in the market right now. You have to earn an income from it, regardless of whether stocks are going up or down. By getting the financial markets to pay you an income, you can get to focus on more important things than just money.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Markets & Money