It has been more than 26 years since the last Australian recession.
The period of economic growth has lasted longer than most thought possible.
But can this growth last forever?
If no one expected it to last 26 years, who’s to say it can’t last 36 or 46 years…or even longer?
It’s not impossible. But it’s not likely. In fact, we wouldn’t be surprised if Australia’s economic growth streak ended before the year was out.
For a long time, folks have viewed Australia as an economic miracle.
While many countries suffered a severe economic collapse in 2008 and 2009, Australia didn’t.
Many countries saw unemployment rates soar. Australia didn’t.
Many countries had to cut interest rates to records lows…and then keep them there. Australia cut rates initially, but then increased them as things improved.
But that’s history. Things have changed. Australia is no longer an economic miracle.
Debt for growth
Here’s the giveaway that the Aussie economy is in more than a spot of bother.
As The Age reports:
‘Reserve Bank governor Glenn Stevens has used his farewell speech to implore the Turnbull government to take on more debt, saying that rate cuts alone can no longer “dial up the growth we need.”’
And for what purpose does Mr Stevens recommend increasing government debt? The report continues:
‘Let me be clear that I am not advocating an increase in deficit financing of day-to-day government spending…
‘The case for governments being prepared to borrow for the right investment assets — long-lived assets that yield an economic returns — does not extend to borrowing to pay pensions, welfare and routine government expenses, other than under the most exceptional circumstances.’
An economy in a strong growth position — one that can withstand whatever the world throws at it — is not an economy that should need an increase in government debt.
By now, if the bureaucratic and political arguments for stimulus spending in 2008 were right, Australia should be as far away from the possibility of a recession as you can get.
But that’s not how it is.
The Australian federal government is in debt to the tune of $431.5 billion. How much more debt does Mr Stevens think Australians should take on?
Surely $431.5 billion is enough to lift and economy out of the clutches of recession.
Download your free report now and discover why our currency could be headed below 50 US cents…what the dollar crash could mean for you…and what you could do today to protect yourself from the fallout.
Simply enter your email address in the box below and click ‘Claim My Free Report’. Plus…you’ll receive a free subscription to Markets and Money.
You can cancel your subscription at any time.
It didn’t work the first time, so try again…
This should be a clear sign for you that things are getting worse rather than better.
Why else would the Reserve Bank of Australia encourage increased government spending — on infrastructure of all things?
Mr Stevens makes a distinction between ‘day-to-day’ spending and borrowing to invest in the ‘right investment assets’.
Our assumption is that Mr Stevens is referring to infrastructure. However, where does the investment in infrastructure end? Is he suggesting that the government should borrow to invest in infrastructure?
If so, what about the ongoing maintenance and servicing costs associated with infrastructure spending?
Remember, once built, any infrastructure investment is a devaluing asset. It suffers from wear and tear and the cost of maintenance.
Could a government finance these costs through debt?
The bottom line to all this is that the stimulus spending from 2008 onwards has finally worn off.
It should be clear enough that artificial stimulus and spending doesn’t work. We’re sure it’s clear for the majority of the population.
Unfortunately, it’s not clear to those in power. If it was, the RBA wouldn’t be in the process of initiating a new stimulus package.
We’ve warned for some time that a recession is on the way for Aussie investors. It appears that the Aussie recession is now more than ever a matter of ‘when’ — not ‘if’.
For Markets and Money
Editor’s Note: This article was originally published in Money Morning.