The Banks’ Halcyon Days Are Over

The Banks’ Halcyon Days Are Over

US stocks fell more than 1% overnight on concern over the strength of the US economy and tensions with Iran in the Strait of Hormuz.

Usually, the market doesn’t mind a bit of weak economic growth. It means central banks will hang around for longer with stock price supporting policies. But yesterday, the Fed said they weren’t too bothered by the weak first quarter US growth number, citing weather as the main issue.

So for the next few weeks at least, the market is on its own.

The steep falls in US stocks haven’t translated to weakness in the Aussie market today. ASX 200 futures are only down one point, and at the open, the market is flat.

So why is the Aussie market holding up today? That’s an interesting question.

It could just be that after two days of decent selling, the market has had enough. Time for ‘bargain hunting’…although there really isn’t much in the way of bargains.

The recent sell-off was all about the banks. While the past two days was somewhat of a short term capitulation, the sell-off actually started in mid March.

Take Aussie bank bellwether Commonwealth Bank [ASX:CBA]. It peaked at just below $97 per share on 23 March. It then trended lower…to around $93 on Tuesday. Then, in the past two days, it lost around $4 per share.

The standard line of thinking is that a strengthening Aussie economy meant interest rate cuts were off the table. Hence, bank stocks, often bought for the ‘yield’, weren’t as attractive.

There is certainly an element of truth to this. Falling interest rates are great for banks. It encourages debt accumulation and asset price speculation…all of which benefits the banks.

You can see the interest rate story through the lens of the government’s 10 year bond yield. Have a look at the chart below. It shows the yield on government 10 year bonds throughout 2015.

As you can see, bond yields fell sharply from the end of 2014 and during January 2015. This triggered a big rally in bank stocks and the market in general. That’s because falling bond yields make dividend paying stocks more attractive.

Then government bond yields went higher, peaking in early March. CBA’s share price bottomed at just under $90 around the same time. It then shot to an all-time high as government bonds yield fell again.

Bond yields have backed off in the past few weeks, which explains some of the banks’ share price weakness. But government bond yields are still below where they were at the start of March, yet bank share prices are at new lows.

This tells you the recent sell-off isn’t just about interest rate movements?

Today’s Financial Review provides a clue:

Almost $20 billion has been wiped off the value of the big four banks by sharemarket investors this week, partly because of expectations the prudential regulator will take quicker-than-expected action to deal with the threat posed by rampant property speculation.

New figures showed the banks expanded loans for property investments in the year ended March by 10.4 per cent, the highest rate since 2008 and more than the 10 per cent threshold imposed by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority in December to stop a property bubble building in Sydney and elsewhere.

Quicker than expected action? How about any action at all? For the past six months, the banking regulator, APRA, has stood by while a destabilising property boom gathered pace in Sydney and Melbourne.

Its one token effort to contain the boom was to write a letter to the banks telling them to go easy on investor lending and restrict it to 10% annual growth. For the most part, the banks ignored the letter and went on taking advantage of easy money, which is what banks do.

But now, there is a fear that APRA could actually do something useful. My guess is that the RBA wants to cut rates again…and again…to get the Aussie dollar down. It doesn’t buy the Adam Carr argument that the economy is on the mend.

But it doesn’t want to risk further price gains in the housing market. That will only increase financial instability in the longer term.

So it’s having closed door talks with APRA, telling them more rate cuts are contingent on more effective macroprudential regulations.

That the country’s top financial bureaucrats couldn’t sort this out proactively is a disgrace. APRA should’ve been on top of this during the RBA’s rate cutting cycle throughout 2013.

Instead, the big banks took advantage of the rate cuts and have been able to get away with employing massive leverage to punt on housing. Chris Joye, writing for the Financial Review, recently shed light on just how significant this leverage is:

Indeed, the regional banks in their FSI [Financial Services Inquiry] report draw attention to the remarkable fact that one major bank holds virtually no capital at all against one-third of its entire mortgage book with a risk-weight of less than 2.9 per cent. This means the bank is leveraging 270 times when providing this finance. 

Another major bank revealed in its FSI response that it holds only 1.3 per cent of equity capital against its entire Aussie home loan book, which translates into 77 times leverage on hundreds of billions of dollars worth of loans.

Wow. And our banks are the safest and best regulated in the world, huh? No wonder David Murray is worried about capital levels. The amount of leverage they’re working with is dangerous.

For the uninitiated, when a bank makes a loan, it needs to set aside capital in the event there is a loss. The big four banks plus Macquarie are allowed to set their own capital weightings, apparently because they’re big enough and smart enough to do so.

I don’t know about you, but to me it looks like they’ve been taking the mickey big time. They’re leveraged up to the eyeballs and very much at risk from a house price correction. Luckily, that will never happen because this is Australia and it’s different here.

Anyway, the RBA is clearly in a panic about this. It wants to cut again but needs APRA to do something to stop the lunacy in the housing market. In the Financial Review’s Banking and Wealth Summit held this week, APRA Chairman Wayne Byers said:

‘…[he] would act “sooner rather than later” to implement the financial system inquiry’s call for the big four banks and Macquarie to hold extra capital against mortgages, which would be likely to hit profit and dividends.’

The RBA meets to decide on interest rates next week. Will they stay on hold and wait for APRA to get its act together, or will they cut in the expectation that changes are on their way?

It’s a close call. Either way, it looks like the halcyon days for the banks might be fading out of view.


Greg Canavan+,
for Markets and Money

Join Markets and Money on Google+

Greg Canavan

Greg Canavan is a Contributing Editor at Markets & Money and Head of Research at Port Phillip Publishing.

He advocates a counter-intuitive investment philosophy based on the old adage that ‘ignorance is bliss’.

Greg says that investing in the ‘Information Age’ means you now have all the information you need. But is it really useful? Much of it is noise, and serves to confuse rather than inform investors.

Greg Canavan

Latest posts by Greg Canavan (see all)

Leave a Reply

3 Comments on "The Banks’ Halcyon Days Are Over"

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
slewie the pi-rat

slewie’s ‘FLATION Report
for US Friday/US Dollar Index [USDX] only.

103.3; -0.5 [-0.48%]

95.16; +0.40 [at ~the time the Bloomie closed; USDX last:
95.25; +0.44 (+0.56%)]

DEflation today, and correlation, also, since the Dollar went UP, and the Bloomie went DOWN.

slewie called Tall Paul Volker and Engine Crew #19% and told them to take the weekend off.
they won’t hafta hose down INflation til next week.
they’re using foam now, they told me.
…they hung up!

Fractional reserve banking normally requires that a bank holds a percentage of cash against its loans in case depositors want their money. If banks are so over leveraged they would never have any hope of meeting their cash obligations if depositors wanted their money, even in our debtor society. So now it is becoming clear. If cash is outlawed then depositors can’t get their money if they want it. There will be nothing for them to get. Hence a level of protection (or the ultimate protection) for the over leveraged banks as there will be absolutely no risk of a… Read more »
slewie the pi-rat
but cash is not outlawed. that is just a “theme” to describe what the banksters MAY be up to. and if it scares people, or leads them falsely, maybe someone gets paid EXTRA? how the hell would we know, Scott? we do k.n.o.w. that “cash” IS Legal Tender and MUST be accepted for ALL debts, public and private [except for my rental managers who are SCARED of cash, b/c some bad guys might come and take it away BEFORE they can take it to the BANK]. L0L!!! and yes, we do know that there is not enough CURRENCY to cover… Read more »
Letters will be edited for clarity, punctuation, spelling and length. Abusive or off-topic comments will not be posted. We will not post all comments.
If you would prefer to email the editor, you can do so by sending an email to