Building a National Economy Around the Housing Industry

With each passing day it becomes more obvious that Australia is in the grip of a housing dementia. Let the madness and unafforadability multiply!

House prices were up 3.3% nationally in the second quarter of the year, according to Australian Property Monitors. The group said that the weighted average median house price in the most expensive capital city suburbs was $796,559. In the slightly less expensive suburbs the weighted average median house price was $405,872.


Aussie stocks are up as we write, bucking the global trend from yesterday. This comes after a 7% retreat by Chinese stocks in Shanghai and lower stocks in New York. What happened in China? Well, China’s benchmark CSI 300 Index was up nearly 93% for the year before yesterday’s retreat. China’s monetary authorities have ignited a speculative bubble and made noises about reining it in yesterday.

Bloomberg reports that Chinese stocks, “Plunged amid speculation the central bank is poised to order lenders to set aside larger reserves, Beijing-based Caijing magazine reported today on its Web site. Market News International said Chinese equities fell on speculation regulators will increase a tax on stock trading.”

Yesterday we asked the question of what would make Australia’s economy grow in the next twenty years. We return to that question today. The Reserve Bank has said that Aussie banks will have to move cautiously as they repair their balances sheets. This suggests growth through debt may be harder to achieve. The RBA also said that the household sector’s twenty year credit binge is over (now that asset prices are returning from orbit). Again, growth through debt is looking dubious as a national survival strategy.

Let’s also assume that the government cannot borrow its way to larger stimulus payments. With lower spending forecast for government, businesses, and households, you begin to wonder if Australia’s economy has a home grown engine, or if it will rely on something else, or someone else beyond the borders. If domestic demand falls, that leaves housing as the only industry firing on all cylinders (for now).

Now you can try building a national economy around the housing industry. But what you get is a nation of mortgage lenders, builders, real estate agents, speculators, and bombastic television presenters. You also get a huge speculative bubble. It’s been tried in America and didn’t work out so well.

If not housing, then why not resources? “Over the medium term,” said Glenn Stevens earlier this week, “the emergence of China (and other countries such as India) will continue, and will offer opportunities for Australia.” This is not news. But what the Governor said next is newsworthy.

“If commodity prices do stay at their relatively high levels on the back of strong emerging world demand, the mineral extraction sector and all those parts of the Australian economy that service it and feel its flow-on effects, will expand. Other sectors, will, relatively, contract over time.”


Does this make the Aussie economy a one trick resource pony? And even if it does, so what? Investors can still profit by finding the lowest-cost mineral extractors with the best ore bodies. As Mr. Stevens noted, even the correction in commodity prices has left them at higher inflation-adjusted levels that previous corrections. Prices came off. But they didn’t crash permanently. Stevens doesn’t think they will, either.

“A significant structural rise in demand for energy and resources has occurred, as a result of the cumulative growth of the emerging world. This seems more likely to be a feature of the international economy for some time than to go away,” he says.

That could either be very true, or famous last words before a burst Chinese credit bubble rips the legs off of Australia’s economy. But we’ll go along with the Governor in the assumption that China’s emergence as an industrial giant is a decade’s long affair. It will have its ups and downs. But the general trend will be mostly up, accounting for the structural rise in demand for energy and resources.”

It sounds, generally, like pretty good news. Of course, you want to be more than just a giant quarry. Wages and profits will be higher for Aussie firms if they can figure out ways to increase productivity and add more value. Investors can capture some of these rising profits and productivity increases through dividends or share price gains.

But adding value in the resource extraction business-and capturing that value added as an investment income-is not a simple proposition. The biggest value add (with the biggest profits) comes higher up the economic food chain (somewhere between retailing and pure intellectual property, where you produce nothing physical, but still collect rents or royalties on your production).

Australia’s national income could benefit from a few industries higher up in the chain of production. But the country’s current position is not a terrible one to be in either. That’s not to say there aren’t a few risks with hitching your wagon to China’s rising star.

“If we are more integrated into China’s expansion,” Stevens said, “will be similarly more exposed to the consequences of whatever might go wrong in that country. So our understanding of how the Chinese economy works and what risks may be accumulating there, will need continual work.”

Speaking of accumulating risks, one final note today. Reuters reports that, “The U.S. Treasury sold $39 billion in five-year debt Wednesday in an auction that drew poor demand, raising worries over the cost of financing the government’s burgeoning budget deficit.” The big-to-cover ratio for the five-year notes was just 1.92, its lowest level in a year.

Will a U.S. bond auction fail this year? It’s not likely. The Feds will rig it to avoid that. But if investors are getting choosier about financing government debt, you wonder how that may affect the ability of the Australian Office of Financial Management to fund this country’s growing fiscal deficit….

Dan Denning
for Markets and Money

Dan Denning
Dan Denning examines the geopolitical and economic events that can affect your investments domestically. He raises the questions you need to answer, in order to survive financially in these turbulent times.

Leave a Reply

9 Comments on "Building a National Economy Around the Housing Industry"

Notify of
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Pat Donnelly
One trick? Look at the list of what we export. The RBA has the highest rate of interest in the OECD? Maybe that cost is keeping us sane? And the high tax levels? We are fiscally very sober, living in our investment! We did not go sub prime because we do not eat our young! There is an industry trying to blame jews for the US mess but you will find a larger number of the tribe here happily living alongside their fellow Australians. The industry trying to blame others is part of that insanity of giving loans to idiots… Read more »
Oscar Hillman

Pat Donnelly,

You response has rendered me apoplectic. I have no words… maybe a few. Jews? What one earth are you talking about. Where did Jews come into this argument? And in the first post, too! Unbelievable.



I’m no expert but I am curious as to what’s on the list of what we export? Doesn’t it fall into two camps: things we dig out of the ground, and things we grow/raise on farms … farms which are increasingly pressured by our lack of water?

Dan .. I agree with your comment that we need to do more further up the food chain, the faster the better.


Pat, every post of yours I read is completely bonkers. You don’t even back up your claims with any kind of rationale.

Patriotism does not make an economy run.

Incidentally if you don’t like being sold to I suggest you offer to donate money instead. Dan doesn’t write as a ‘hobby’.

gee whiz, is it the Chinese Communists fault, or the Jews fault that the mother of all crack up booms has leveled the global economy ? ha! everybody knows it’s the poor people’s fault. their not working cheap enough or spending enough… nope regardless of what you didn’t hear, it had nothing to do with the wizards of wall street and their cocaine and champagne addictions. but not to worry, those brainiacs in DC are going to create lot’s of jobs, fix the health care system (who the hell wants those allopath physicians and their pills and potions anyway ?)… Read more »

very thoughtful and fruitful line of thinking
…what about Telstra and national broadband expansion as a huge grower?


…or how about building an aqueduct north to south-
and greening half of Australia?

p.s. I voted but don’t let it go to your head


Now if only capital was made available to real resource companies (the one who intend to make money actually selling the resources and doing so efficiently) rather that so called ‘resource companies’ whose objective is to sell stock to mullets.

It doesn’t help that some state and federal mining agencies assist the fraudsters by publishing bogus models or providing ‘painted’ geophysical data. Banks would be well advised to get some real expertise in-house and evaluate projects very closely lest they be lending to ‘develop’ nonexistent ore bodies and oil fields.


For resources the AUD rebounded sharply off its low and the money comes immy back into the market for resources. The day trading strategy may be working but the momentum volatility is ridiculous. Noted BG LNG market comments yesterday, and that the export market to the US is dead. Noted Market Ticker comments on TRIN data system malfunction which he attributes all today’s market gains.

Letters will be edited for clarity, punctuation, spelling and length. Abusive or off-topic comments will not be posted. We will not post all comments.
If you would prefer to email the editor, you can do so by sending an email to