Chinese Government Expected to Sign Off on Second Stimulus Package

Stocks in New York closed nearly on their lows on Thursday. That’s usually not a good sign. It indicates there might be a bit more selling pressure. But they did manage to close up just ahead of the session lows, which leaves us wondering where things stand at the end of the week.

U.S. investors are on edge because another employment report is due out tomorrow. You can’t really have a recovery if an economy isn’t producing jobs. And so far this recovery – which is what some people are calling it – isn’t producing any jobs. No jobs, no recovery. No recovery, no justification for higher stock valuations.

But who needs justification when you have speculation? That’s what low interest rates encourage. And that’s the market we have. You can trade it. Just be prepared for some turbulence next year. Reality will drag stock prices back down like gravity. But central bankers will try and push them up with more money and governments will chip in with more stimulus.

For example, in today’s Australian, Michael Sainsbury reports that the Australian economy will, “ride a second wave of China stimulation.” He writes that, “The Australian economy is set for another free kick as the Chinese government is expected to sign off on a second stimulus package after its annual Central Economic Work Conference to be held in Beijing at the weekend.”

Chinese bank lending and credit growth is already through the roof. Last year’s $685 billion stimulus program sent fixed asset investment in China much higher. It was, by most accounts, hugely supportive of resource prices, and thus most welcome in Australian resource circles.

But frankly another dose of stimulus from China sounds like madness. There is already growing anecdotal evidence that China has overinvested in production and accumulated large commodity inventories. Bloomberg reports that warehouses at the London Metals Exchange hold enough aluminium to produce 69,000 Boeing 747s.

Clearly that amount of stockpiling is not matched by current demand. And if it’s anticipating a booming recovery, it will be some recovery. So you have to consider what else this sort of information might mean.

When we think about it for a second, it might mean that investors and institutions are again thinking that commodities are the best refuge in an inflationary world. It could be dollar carry traders. Or speculators. But it’s most likely investor’s expressing a preference for real assets.

This is a big warning sign, though. The biggest mistake made by natural resource investors in 2008 – your editor included – was believing that resource stocks would be a good defence against the collapse of the credit bubble in the financial economy. This turned out to be painfully wrong. Resource stocks, along with commodity prices, fell as the deleveraging of the household sector began.

Since then, of course, stocks have rallied as policy makers try to engineer a “re-leveraging” (and backdoor recapitalisation of the banking sector). Households continue to wind down debt growth and increase savings. But governments are taking on more debt than ever and spending at a furious pace.

This means that the first half of next year could see stock prices float higher on this monetary and fiscal stimulus. It won’t be grounded in any fundamental relationship to earnings growth. But you probably wouldn’t complain too much if it helped you repair some of the damage to your portfolio from the last two years.

That said, our approach for 2010 would be to sell into rallies and gradually reduce the allocation to shares. The use of trailing-stops will help you take the emotion out of your selling decisions and lock in profits. Of course if you believe we are in a long-term bull market, you will deride the use of trailing stops because it forces you out of positions that may cost you more to re-enter at a later date.

But it comes down to what you want from the market and what it’s realistic to expect next year. We reckon it will be range-bound, as Dr. Marc Faber suggests in his latest Gloom, Boom, and Doom Report. You’ll need to be a good market timer if you want to buy low and sell high. If you’re a buy and holder, well, there could be quite a few restless nights.

And the biggest risk by far is that China is entering big bubble territory. That would be especially hard on Australia. Harder, even, than a commercial real estate route or another decline in U.S. housing prices related to wave of Option-ARMS set to recast next year. Pick your poison.

At some point, you’d expect quantitative easing policies to either be curtailed (because they devalue a currency, which sooner or later a population notices in decreased purchasing power) or interest rates to move higher. This would trigger another mad scramble in the markets. Even if central banks like the Fed succeed in manipulating rates lower for awhile, the market is already responding by bidding up gold (an asset that is no one else’s liability).

In the meantime the great charade goes on. The big benefit to you is that a rising stock market is the perfect cover for you to make a serious evaluation of your investment strategy and asset allocation and make changes by choice, not by necessity. In a falling market with forced liquidation, you have a lot fewer choices.

While your editor is away next week in South Africa, you’ll hear from three guest editors. All of them are in charge of various investment beats, which means rather than writing about the market each day (as we do) they are beating the bushes for the best investment ideas for next year. They’ll share them with you next week. Be sure to give them a piece of your mind!

Dan Denning
for Markets and Money

Dan Denning
Dan Denning examines the geopolitical and economic events that can affect your investments domestically. He raises the questions you need to answer, in order to survive financially in these turbulent times.

Leave a Reply

8 Comments on "Chinese Government Expected to Sign Off on Second Stimulus Package"

Notify of
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Piers container no.s should provide the direction of Chinese near term growth. I don’t expect too much good news but I am flumoxed by some of the US and global data that is saying that consumption goods are holding up and only auto and capital equipment is down deep. My trade figures out of transportation provider gross revenues would have it looking horrible across the discretionary side and the latest depressed US services figures match the lack of credit into the real US economy so for mine someone could be b/s’ing big time. If not clear from Piers then I… Read more »
Lachlan Scanlan

Maybe not so hard pressed now since USD gained big last night Ross….a full point anyhow. Interesting the Dow didnt blow up. I hope it reverses or my gold goose cooked.

Lachlan Scanlan

Although I expect to see gold ralley with USD at some point. Good luck anyhow Ross.

Lachlan, this is the Vox report I am working through. The stupidity of not seeing the significance of using a USD base on trade figures when examining trade shifts in that deleveraging period must be used to reedit all their conclusions. Working in value and often excluding volume has lead them up the garden path too. This maybe the LSE but they carry on like a bunch of americans that just don’t get exchange rates and how 20%+ world reserve & commodity currency moves create distortions in inventory trade & commodity price recorded trade short term. All I can… Read more »
The two quotes below are from Business Spectators story about an article in the People’s Daily (China’s official newspaper). QUOTE1: If other countries “allow their currencies to freely appreciate, then their already severely diminished exports will deteriorate,” it said. QUOTE 2: “If they maintain exchange rate stability (against the dollar), their central banks will have to buy more dollars on the foreign exchange market, and this will increase liquidity in their own currencies, further inflating asset prices”, it said. Quote 1 clearly shows that if the chinese appreciate their currency their export industry will collapse leading to increased unemployment and… Read more »

Stimulus packages are a perpetuation of failed economic management which of course will end even worse.


guest editors? ew! Please don’t hand the reins over to that dreary Chris Tomato Sayce. Bo-ring and a total zzzzzzzz

Wonder when Daily Reckoning will get serious about China? Today’s US-version of DR carries two totally different positions, a kind of ‘two bob each way’ stance you wouldn’t normally expect from Bonner & Crew. Final conclusion? You should invest in China ..” a little…” . Amusing to see China bundled up in the ‘Australasia’ section of DRA… yet Africa has its own section. We’d have to accept that the Menu has limited space… and this is probably a geographical classification, rather than anything else, bit it _may_ underscore DR’s lack of positive conviction about China’s emerging status as a world… Read more »
Letters will be edited for clarity, punctuation, spelling and length. Abusive or off-topic comments will not be posted. We will not post all comments.
If you would prefer to email the editor, you can do so by sending an email to