Contrarian Thinking Secured Me Against Over Optimism in the Boom Years

What are the upside possibilities in this grim situation? There is no doubt that investors of all kinds are looking to the dark side of all possible expectations. I call myself a contrarian, and contrarian thinking secured me against over optimism in the boom years of the 1990s and early 2000s. Surely I now have a duty to look at the contrarian view, even when it contradicts an instinctive feeling that there is a great deal of trouble still ahead of us.

Contrarianism has never meant a simple reversal of the immediate situation. Contrarians do not say to themselves, or to their fellow contrarians, “GM, Ford and Chrysler are in terrible trouble, let us pile into their shares.” In a week when almost all the news is bad, one has to be a cautious if one is to avoid further nasty surprises. Contrarianism is a matter of hedging one’s expectations, so as to avoid surprises.

The first contrarian point can be made about the stock market. There are a large number of companies which meet two criteria. They can be expected to survive the crisis and their shares are much cheaper than they were. I am not a stock picker, but a glance at the stocks listed on the New York Stock Exchange shows that there is a good choice of shares which offer a price earnings ratio below 10 and a share price below half the high level for 2008. Which of these shares are in good shape I do not know, but collectively they offer good value. They may, or may not, be near the bottom, but in three years time I feel that they will, collectively, seem to have been bargains. In emerging market stocks there are some even more striking bargains, with price earnings at 5 or even below. Of course, one has to avoid shares in companies which are in the eye of the storm – such as companies which make automobile components or sell real estate.

The strongest macroeconomic reassurance comes from the “automatic stabilisers”. In the early 1930s, most countries had private spending which accounted for between 80 and 90 per cent of national income. When spending was cut by private individuals to protect their own finances, there was little public spending to maintain the balance. That created a competition in mutual impoverishment, well recorded in Maynard Keynes’s General Theory (1936).

Governments in the early 1930s tended to cut their own spending, in a premature effort to balance their budgets. When private individuals cut back nowadays, Governments not only maintain their expenditure, but actually increase it as a part of a contracyclical policy. At some point in the future, this may lead to Governments having to cut back to avoid inflation, but the initial consequence is that Government spending acts as a contracyclical, anti-deflationary, force. This does not mean that Governments have all been converted to Keynesianism; it is rather that the old doctrine of balancing budgets in order to maintain fixed rate convertibility has virtually disappeared. There is no longer international pressure on Governments to make deflationary periods worse by deflating themselves.

I would add a third contrarian argument. One should never underestimate the capacity of human beings to respond to challenges. Homo Sapiens has got through 50,000 years of evolution by surviving individual and collective challenges of a fearsome kind. As a species we may have made many mistakes, but we are survivors. Democracy, as the dominant political structure of the 21st Century, gives humanity a flexibility of organisation and requires Governments to be responsive to human needs.

There is a time lag between any economic crisis and its resolution. But no contrarian ought ever to despair. Human experience can be summed up in proverbs. One such proverb is that it is always darkest before the dawn. It is pretty dark right now.

William Rees-Mogg
for Markets and Money

William Rees-Mogg
Leading political editor William Rees-Mogg is former editor-in-chief for The Times and a member of the House of Lords. He has been credited with accurately forecasting glasnost and the fall of the Berlin Wall – as well as the 1987 crash. His political commentary appears in The Times every Monday. His financial insights can only be found in the Fleet Street Letter, the UK's longest-running investment newsletter.

Leave a Reply

6 Comments on "Contrarian Thinking Secured Me Against Over Optimism in the Boom Years"

Notify of
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted

mmmmmmm …. automatic stabilisers and the future of the pound?

The nation of shopkeepers pushes the envelope with financial jockey services displacing rust belt industry and meanwhile oil & gas production dwindles (that which had paid for Maggy the shopkeeper’s restructuring adventures). Lord William Rees-Mogg should take care when doing the happy clapping not to inadvertently be the sage of his empire’s ruin.

Jon Bain

Whichever company has the forsight to take a slightly contrary point of view and build the vehicle which we will travel in, in the future is worth investing in.

This new type of aircraft is the most stable ever, it flies optimally in windiest conditions, sucking in the energy of the wind, to give it lift.

Bear market rally. Dan has speculated that the sharemarket may experience a rally comparable to mid-November 1929 to mid-April 1930. Some news items hint at this possibility. On September 2, 2008 this news heading appeared: “Tice: Huge Stock Decline Ahead”. The article reported: “David Tice has made himself famous for successfully shorting stocks. Now the investment manager sees a bear market for the next five years, with share prices dropping 50 percent to 70 percent over the next 18 months. “Tice says it’s difficult to predict when the market’s plunge will begin. “Who knows what will happen to the market… Read more »
Obviously at their peak circa 2001 Wall Street stocks were at about 40% overprices (or more) based on traditional PE ratios. This ten year greatest period of wealth creation in US history was merely asset inflation. The steps taken by Greenspan to prop-up stocks in 2001 resulted in the housing bubble which brings us to where we are now. Hindsight is 20/20 vision, but there were many people including myself that were critical of what was happening at the time. This made Greenspan a short-term hero and a long-term failure which matches exactly the policies that he pursued. We cannot… Read more »
Greg Atkinson

There is no doubt that at the moment gloom and doom is the order of the day and as a result we are all subject to an endless barrage of “I told you so” articles and comments about the evil greed of Wall Street etc. So it is refreshing to read something that is a little more optimistic about the future. I hope that in 12 months time we have the bulls back out in force because they are far more cheerful chaps!


Another proverb is , its darkest just before it goes pitch black……

Letters will be edited for clarity, punctuation, spelling and length. Abusive or off-topic comments will not be posted. We will not post all comments.
If you would prefer to email the editor, you can do so by sending an email to