Now you say you’re sorry
For being so untrue
Well, you can cry me a river, cry me a river
I cried, cried, cried a river over you.
– From ‘Cry Me a River’ by Arthur Hamilton
Dow down. Gold flat. We turn to other things. You know our position on foreign affairs: We think there shouldn’t be any.
But sometimes the news takes our breath away. Here with a brief summary of the situation in Crimea…
In 1954, Soviet head of state Nikita Kruschev – who was half-Ukrainian and grew up along what is now the Russian-Ukrainian border – gave Crimea to Ukraine. But the population of Crimea is mostly Russian-speaking and has had a strong Russian presence for more than 200 years. This includes an important Russian naval base.
Feeling threatened by the regime change in Ukraine (where the government is variously reported to be either ‘thuggish’ or ‘incompetent’) the Crimean parliament asked Russia to intervene. Putin sent in troops, thus securing an important Black Sea port – Sevastopol – on his southern flank.
The Crimean parliament now wants a referendum within the region (one that will, importantly, not ask the opinion of Ukrainians outside Crimea) to decide how the people of Crimea wish to be governed – by the Ukrainians or by the Russians. Odds are they will choose Russia.
This has outraged Western powers…which is when our eyes began to mist.
‘You just don’t invade a country under a phony pretext!‘ said US Secretary of State John Kerry.
Kerry’s indignation sounds like the sincere homage vice pays to virtue. He surely knows a pretext is just what you need.
A veteran of Vietnam, the Secretary of State is not only aware of America’s hapless invasions of the Dominican Republic, Lebanon, Grenada, Panama, Haiti, Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia and Libya. He participated in one of them…after the phony Gulf of Tonkin ‘incident’.
An empire must have its enemies and its pretexts, its pet intellectuals and its warmongering pit bulls. Vlad ‘The Bad’ Putin is a problem, they tell us. We turn to Tom Friedman for a reliably idiotic solution. He doesn’t disappoint. Here’s how to fix the situation, he says:
‘[By] putting the right long-term policies in place. That is by investing in the facilities to liquefy and export our natural gas bounty (provided it is extracted at the highest environmental standards) and making Europe, which gets 30% of its gas from Russia, more dependent on us instead.
‘I’d also raise our gasoline tax, put in place a carbon tax and a national renewable energy portfolio standard – all of which would help lower the global oil price (and make us stronger, with cleaner air, less oil dependence and more innovation).
‘You want to frighten Putin? Just announce those steps.‘
We don’t know why we would want to frighten Putin. But foreign policy ‘experts’ such as Friedman begin to talk this way when they’ve had too much to drink or too little to eat. They get a little light-headed.
How would forcing Americans to pay more for their gasoline hurt Putin? According to Friedman, it would lower demand for energy…thereby cutting into Russia’s export profits. This would surely hurt Americans, too.
Would it hurt Putin? Who knows? But what the heck! Give it a try. See how it works out.
Friedman imagines he can know all the billions of facts on the ground in places he’s never been and improve the outcome in situations he can never understand. From the safety of his column at the New York Times, he led the charge into Iraq…and now into Crimea!
What a thrill for these Roosevelt wannabes and Wilson manqués. Their children may ignore them. Their wives may think them foolish, pompous and ineffectual. But vicariously, foreign policies allow them to boss around whole nations. They are no longer victims of history, but its master…
But thank God for them all. They are history’s biggest fools. Without them, we wouldn’t have so many exciting wars…so much Sturm und Drang…so many entertaining stories in the newspaper.
What would the Cossacks have done without Napoleon’s Grande Armée? What use was the atom bomb without Hiroshima? And what would the fodder do without the canons?
for Markets and Money
Download this free report now and discover:
- Why you could lop 31.5% off your annual tax bill by contributing more to your super…and why paying less tax could help your retirement savings compound more quickly…and help you retire sooner.
- The definitive list of pros and cons for going self-managed: most investors don’t understand the hefty fees associated with running a SMSF — until it’s too late…if you don’t want the ATO to freeze your SMSF — read this…
- Seven checks to see if it’s worth you setting up a SMSF: including the amount of money you have to invest…your investment history…what kind of insurance cover you need…whether you’re good at keeping records…pay attention: this is the small print stuff you need to know…
To download your free report ‘How to Know if a SMSF is Right for You…’ simply subscribe to Markets and Money for FREE today. Enter your email in the box below and click ‘Send My Free Report’.
You can cancel your subscription at any time.