Did Marx Know All This Was Coming?

Your Melbourne-based editor is up to his eye-balls in a project that you’ll read about shortly. In the meantime…a few reader notes.

Reading the Markets and Money today reminded me of a quote made 100 years ago by Karl Marx

“Owners of capital will stimulate the working class to buy more and more of expensive goods, houses and technology, pushing them to take more and more expensive credits, until their debt becomes unbearable. The unpaid debt will lead to bankruptcy of banks, which will have to be
nationalized, and the State will have to take the road which will eventually lead to communism.”

– Karl Marx, 1867, Das Kapital

That quote is almost assuredly bogus. We haven’t tormented ourselves by re-reading sections of Das Kapital. Once in college was enough. This quote, though, has been making the rounds on the Internet, as if Marx and his minions somehow knew all this was coming.

Whether the analysis is accurate is a separate question from whether Marx ever wrote it. German is a torturous language to read in translation, full of compound sentences and words. And it’s highly unlikely, writing in the late 19th century, that Marx would have referred to the working class buying houses and technology. The horseless carriage hadn’t even been invented yet, much less the iPod, the BlueRay, or the George Foreman grill.

Nope. This is a clever bit of revisionism by some unemployed Marxist student or tenured professor trying to discredit the free market while rehabilitating the Marxist playbook. Marx did indeed say capitalism would eventually evolve into socialism and finally communism. He claimed it was riddled by contradictions which made the system inherently unstable.

But his theory was evolutionary, based on his views of human nature and a rational “homo economicus.” Like Adam Smith, Marx was a materialist who defined wealth in terms of physical goods. Thus, his view of human nature is rather materiel too, which explains his atheism.

In any event, the Austrians (especially Rothbard) would point out that the boom-bust feature of capitalist economies is not inherent in the system, but is actually a product of the government’s manipulation of interest rates. This changes the price of money and causes risk taking entrepreneurs to mis-calculate the underlying demand for their production.

Thus, you get a massive, credit-induced production bubble, global in scale with resources devoted to supplying a fictional demand. It happened with residential real estate in the U.S. and Europe. It’s happened with commercial real estate in China. And it probably happened all along the commodity supply chain, as raw material demand increased for the production of finished goods made in China for Americans who bought on credit.

That isn’t to say you wouldn’t have normal cycles of growth and recession in an economy with natural interest rates. But in an economy with natural interest rates, the cost of capital would go up during a recession. Bankers would get more prudent with their lending as the market place sorted out which lending resulted in productive new enterprise and which businesses failed.

The bad investments would be written down and eventually new demand for capital from entrepreneurs would resume. At least, that’s how the Austrians drew it up. Today, of course, we are engaged in the great global project of trying to prop up investments gone bad, whether they be in residential American real estate or the collateralised bonds based on that real estate that currently reside like dead weight on balance sheets all over the globe.

No amount of rearranging is going to improve the quality of those debts. But that won’t keep political busy bodies from trying-and wasting even more time and capital.


Meanwhile, some better news!

Hello DR,

Thank you for making me feel like the biblical Noah. I am Dinakarananda from India and I am grateful to the entire DR team. I have been an avid reader of DR for the past two years. I am very happy that I stumbled on DR soon after I landed in Melbourne and looking for some Australian business news website that was sensible and truthful. I have been an avid investor in India since 1993 and in the US since 1999. I cashed out almost all my investments in equities and bought 130Kg of gold back in October-November of 2007. DR was one of the major factors that influenced my decision and I am happy every minute of my life now to have found DR.

Thanks a lot to Dan Denning, Bill Bonner, Mogambo guru and all of you in the DR team for guiding my ark and investments. One of those slumdog to millionaire stories inspired by DR I presume. I would be happy if my email finds its way to the reader email that is occasionally published and if it helps a few more slumdogs around the world.

Yours sincerely,


And the Oscar for best letter of the day goes to you!

Dan Denning
for Markets and Money

Dan Denning
Dan Denning examines the geopolitical and economic events that can affect your investments domestically. He raises the questions you need to answer, in order to survive financially in these turbulent times.

Leave a Reply

6 Comments on "Did Marx Know All This Was Coming?"

Notify of
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted

Artificially low prices usually lead to shortages ! We have seen this happen many times, ie govt setting of petrol prices leading fuel shortages and long queues at US service stations in the 70s. But now you want us to believe that setting interest rates lower than what would have otherwise happen in a free market would attract the huge capital flows to these markets. Cmon, something else is going on here..

Karl Marx: A Convenient Prophet « The Firing Squid

[…] Marx: A Convenient Prophet Jump to Comments An article appeared on the marketsandmoney.com.au website (which incidentally is a pretty consistently good read) asking whether Marx could have […]

Did Marx Know All This Was Coming?

[…] The Daily Reckoning Australia […]


William, you are right that a price ceiling normally creates shortages, however in this case the shortage would arise in available capital (excess demand and a shortage of supply of capital). However, this was countered by the printing of money to meet the demand, which resulted in the asset bubbles (you have to have excess money supply in order to get a bubble – the money has to come from somewhere and other asset classes didn’t go down in value).

U.K 2000-2003 the value of the housing stock increased by 40% Inflation was rated at between 2 and 3% (CPI) and so throughout this period commercial rates were set based on CPI via the MPC whose sole job was to manage the economy to keep CPI between 2 and 3%. Now in the U.K the housing market accounts for some 40% of the economy. So inside 3 years 40% of the economy doubled. The rest grew at 2-3%. Since the debt created (magic money) to support this 40% boom in the economy was ‘really’ made, if not actually printed, then… Read more »

Correction to my first line in previous post.
2000-2003 housing stock increased in value by 100%, hence the 40% of the economy constituting a 40% inflation during this period.
Obviously thinking ahead and missing the minute detail.

Letters will be edited for clarity, punctuation, spelling and length. Abusive or off-topic comments will not be posted. We will not post all comments.
If you would prefer to email the editor, you can do so by sending an email to letters@marketsandmoney.com.au