And how do you like that James Bullard?
Stocks have barely begun to correct (the S&P 500 is down about 7% from its September high) and the St. Louis Fed president is already preparing for QE4.
But where is the proof — from logic or experience — that quantitative easing pays off?
It is a shame that quack philosophers, politicians and central bankers are not subject to penalty. After all, bridge builders and hedge fund managers suffer shame and ruin when their projects fall to pieces.
Couldn’t some suitable stick be laid on world improvers, too? Preferably before their wacky programs are put into service.
For example, when they make a claim that cannot be supported by rigorous proof, they should lose a year’s worth of income…or have their genitalia cut off. Maybe that would slow them down.
Yes, dear reader. Things are setting up pretty much as expected. That is to say in a way that seems logically coherent, but is nevertheless incomprehensible.
Liquidity is drying up. Volatility is returning. The leaves are falling. Investors are getting nervous. And Fed officials are promising more cash and credit, neither of which they actually possess.
You’ll recall that stocks fell when QE1 and QE2 ended. Why shouldn’t they fall now that QE3 is ending too?
No doubt, they will. And that will set little feet running in predictable, but preposterous, directions.
Bertrand Russell published his famous book in 1912. Called The Problems of Philosophy, it raised questions about how we know things and how we can prove that anything we think we know is true.
Turns out the universe is far more complex than our best philosophers (let alone Bertrand Russell) can comprehend…or our evolved language can describe…or our simpleminded logic can illustrate.
For example, you tell us all politicians always lie. We ask, How do you know?
I have it on good authority, you reply. A senator told me.
Hmmm. Now, what do I know?
Not much. The senator may be a good authority on the scoundrels of the US Senate, but he is disqualified as a source of honest opinion or observation.
‘Although the sun has risen every day previously’, wrote Russell, ‘we have no reason to expect the sun to rise tomorrow.’
There, poor Bertie was mistaken. We have every reason to think it will rise. We just don’t know for sure. This was the ‘black swan’ problem Nassim Taleb popularized a century later.
Perhaps, every once in a very long while, the sun does not rise…black swans appear…and it’s a new era.
But we only bring this up to remind readers that it is usually the same old era. For now, the sun still appears on schedule. A kiss is still a kiss. And stock markets still go down as well as up.
That much we take for granted. Always has been that way. Always will be.
Still, there is something very new on this water planet: central bankers who think they can succeed where philosophers fail.
Without explanation, they think they know where the S&P 500 — and the FTSE 100 and the Nikkei 225 — should be.
Never before in the long, comic history of mankind and his money have bankers taken such a keen interest in asset prices. Now they create money — out of nowhere — for the express purpose of pushing them up.
Should those prices fall — as they naturally and episodically do — you can be sure that some lunkhead such as Bullard will be quick to roll out the fire hoses.
‘US stocks recovered from an early plunge as St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank President James Bullard said policymakers should consider delaying the end of bond purchases to halt the decline in inflation expectations.’
Widely reported was that the Bullard comments gave the market ‘a shot of adrenaline’.
Said St. Louis money manager Chad Morganlander: ‘The overall markets are hooked on QE and liquidity is being withdrawn.’
Adrenaline now. The hard drugs will come later. More highs. But more lows, too.
Monday…what happens when the Federal Reserve comes forward with more liquidity.
For Markets and Money