Gold and the Wacky Human Mind

The voting machine that is the market deemed an ounce of gold to be worth US$1,600 a few days ago and then, whoops, two days later, that same market, the collection of rational minds that trade in the metal, valued that same ounce to be worth less than US$1,400.

Keep in mind: These prices are in dollars that are not backed by anything other than Uncle Sam’s less-than-creditworthy promise.

Economists of the rational-expectations school and believers in the efficient-market hypothesis must be scratching their heads. These deep thinkers contend all information is known in the market. There are no such things as bubbles and busts.

Wikipedia explains rational expectations,

‘it is assumed that outcomes that are being forecast do not differ systematically from the market equilibrium results. That is, it assumes that people do not make systematic errors when predicting the future, and deviations from perfect foresight are only random.’

Yep, that sounds exactly like you, me, and your idiot brother-in-law. Nobody makes mistakes when predicting the future.

Yeah, right.

At the same time, Eugene Fama, father of the efficient-markets hypothesis, says, ‘I think most bubbles are 20-20 hindsight.’ When asked by John Cassidy at the New Yorker to clarify whether he thought bubbles can exist, Fama answered ‘They [bubbles] have to be predictable phenomena.

Fama is no Nobel laureate, but he did co-author a textbook with Nobel Prize winner Merton H. Miller, and he himself has won plenty of prestigious awards for his theoretical work.

These guys can theorise all they want to, and win awards doing it, but what they have to say has nothing to do with how markets act and react.

Alec Macfie was an economist lecturing at the University of Glasgow back in the 1930s. He had a better head on his shoulders than today’s fuzzy-minded theoreticians who evidently haven’t taken the time to look out of their campus office windows to see how the world really works.

Macfie explores the ups and downs of the business cycle as well as investment booms and busts in his elegantly written Theories of the Trade Cycle.

He not only, among other things, provides a clear synopsis of Hayek’s Austrian Business Cycle theory, but he also makes use of psychology to solve the business cycle puzzle. Investor errors are revealed in a crash as entrepreneurial errors are revealed by recessions. In Macfie’s view, the term error should be substituted with ‘excesses of optimism and pessimism.

He explains that in a bull market the possibility of potential profits is spread by suggestion and is overemphasized. Investors hear the potential but not any opposing rational criticism.

A man acting under the influence of suggestion is like commander of a submarine observing his enemy through a periscope. He sees his easy prey and is impelled toward it, but his periscope cloaks from him the surrounding dangers,’ writes Macfie.

But how could investors or entrepreneurs go from bullish to bearish so quickly to create huge drops in assets prices? A. C. Pigou, a renowned English economist at the time, sheds some light on this, explaining,

An industrial boom has necessarily been a period of strong emotional excitement, and an excited man passes from one form of excitement to another more readily than he passes to quiescence.’

So for investors there is no inbetween, they go from bullish to bearish in the blink of an eye. Just what is it that sets them off?

It is, of course, common knowledge that we tend to manufacture rational explanations for conduct which springs largely from our unconscious urges,’ Macfie explains. ‘Every politician, every elector, exemplifies this.’

Manufactured rational explanations or rationalization is constant in individual finance, according to Elliott Wave’s Robert Prechter. Individuals use reason to succeed in economic endeavours.

However, in finance, individuals rationalize the decisions they have made that amount to simply herding with other investors. Rather than make their own valuations, investors depend upon others’ valuations. Rather than having knowledge about markets they remain ignorant. Rather than using objective value, investors value subjectively.

Bubbles and crashes are consistent with nonrational risk aversion, but not with rational assessments of risk. Still, people are hyper risk sensitive and often resort to bailout first and analyse later. ‘Thus, it is the instinct of each herd member to flee from danger that supplies the force behind the stampede,’ writes Professor Macfie, even though that force maybe be a mere suggestion.

And while an individual will achieve prosperity acting in the economic sphere, that same person will chase booms and busts in finance. Why?

According to Prechter, speaking at the 2013 Socionomics Summit in Atlanta, these decisions are made with two completely different parts of the brain. We use the rational part of our brain, the neocortex, to make economic decisions and maximize utility.

However, investment decisions are made in the limbic system, which is driven by emotion, making us follow the herd. Does any of this make sense from an evolutionary standpoint? Actually, yes, according to Prechter, ‘Prosperity keeps humans alive in the short run. Setbacks keep the species alive in the long run.’

The pummelling of gold was certainly a setback for those who are betting against the central bank controlled new world order. But one should realize that central bankers are no more than academic theoreticians lucky enough to get a government job. Their views of how the how the economy and markets work have no basis in reality.

Yes, the gold herd was spooked a few days ago. But the yellow metal has been around a lot longer than Ph.D. economists and will prove more durable in the end.


Douglas French
for Markets and Money

Join Markets and Money on Google+

From the Archives…

China’s Credit Boom Krakatoa
12-04-13 – Greg Canavan

The Market Is High
11-04-13 – Greg Canavan

Gold vs Bitcoin
10-04-13 – Greg Guenther

Is Cyprus More Important Than You Think?
9-04-13 – Satyajit Das

Our Largest Asian Trading Partners Are in Trouble: China and Japan
8-04-13 – Greg Canavan

Douglas French
Douglas French is president of the Mises Institute and author of Early Speculative Bubbles & Increases in the Money Supply. He received his masters degree in economics from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, under Murray Rothbard with Professor Hans-Hermann Hoppe serving on his thesis committee.
Douglas French

Latest posts by Douglas French (see all)

Leave a Reply

5 Comments on "Gold and the Wacky Human Mind"

Notify of
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
slewie the pi-rat
especially with some good tobacky! there are different approaches to studying human BEing. as in economics, what everybody ‘agrees on’ may be relatively useless, for practical purposes, at least compared to some other approach. and might even cause some… pathology? again, similar dynamic as in ‘economics’. theoretically, of course… my take on the gold debacle is old news at this point. 1) the YEN “QE and devaluation” coupled with 2) the carry trade in gold and the “bets” of, say Kyle Bass-types, quite widely-published, regarding certain Japanese paper and long gold in various levered configurations and some extra “YEN-product” puts,… Read more »
slewie the pi-rat

but wait!
do i see 10 more cornets?

here’s another piece which i am pondering around this “deflationary price action” [if you will]: the corn, wheat and bean markets broke first. on the crimex…

just before the “close” on Good Friday, 3.29.13. straight down, BIG. done!

my thought was around the “dollar”: if we are making it expensive [the “dollar”] and we want to sell agri-products, we might need to LOWER the price of the products so people can afford to pick them up and eat…?
at least for now?
in other currencies?
too simple?

not for Americans. we have SNAP! Hahaha!

slewie the pi-rat
here is the gold price in YEN. interactive, too! here it gold in green stamps over ~the same time frame: the crimex blow-off appears to have been “triggered” by the “top” in the YEN price, to moi. now here is the long-term in U$D: that is the all-time mofo gold price, nominally. indraday: $1900 + 1 silver war nickel. finally, the SNB pegged the EUR most recently ~August 11, 2011, according to my research, and i would say that this has proved, so far, to be an enormous job for the printer. if people would pay me… Read more »
Paul Frost

Nice work Slewie. Great post.

slewie the pi-rat

thx, PF.
that last link is not the weekly, but that is easily fixed [chart “term”], to see the 2011 “peak”.

do your own research on that SNB devaluation at the “same” time, OK?

these are both devaluations in which the “other” in the CHF/EUR and YEN/U$D pairs (EUR & U$D) went UP.
and Au took a “hit” in these “major” currencies?
with a bankster bunker buster? L0L!!!

Letters will be edited for clarity, punctuation, spelling and length. Abusive or off-topic comments will not be posted. We will not post all comments.
If you would prefer to email the editor, you can do so by sending an email to