How Empires Really Work

Great empires, such as the Roman and British, were extractive. The empires succeeded, because the value of the resources and wealth extracted from conquered lands exceeded the value of conquest and governance. The reason Rome did not extend its empire east into Germany was not the military prowess of Germanic tribes but Rome’s calculation that the cost of conquest exceeded the value of extractable resources.

The Roman empire failed, because Romans exhausted manpower and resources in civil wars fighting amongst themselves for power. The British empire failed, because the British exhausted themselves fighting Germany in two world wars.

In his book, The Rule of Empires (2010), Timothy H. Parsons replaces the myth of the civilizing empire with the truth of the extractive empire. He describes the successes of the Romans, the Umayyad Caliphate, the Spanish in Peru, Napoleon in Italy, and the British in India and Kenya in extracting resources. To lower the cost of governing Kenya, the British instigated tribal consciousness and invented tribal customs that worked to British advantage.

Parsons does not examine the American empire, but in his introduction to the book he wonders whether America’s empire is really an empire as the Americans don’t seem to get any extractive benefits from it.

After eight years of war and attempted occupation of Iraq, all Washington has for its efforts is several trillion dollars of additional debt and no Iraqi oil. After ten years of trillion dollar struggle against the Taliban in Afghanistan, Washington has nothing to show for it except possibly some part of the drug trade that can be used to fund covert CIA operations.

America’s wars are very expensive. Bush and Obama have doubled the national debt, and the American people have no benefits from it. No riches, no bread and circuses flow to Americans from Washington’s wars. So what is it all about?

The answer is that Washington’s empire extracts resources from the American people for the benefit of the few powerful interest groups that rule America. The military-security complex, Wall Street, agri-business and the Israel Lobby use the government to extract resources from Americans to serve their profits and power.

The US Constitution has been extracted in the interests of the Security State, and Americans’ incomes have been redirected to the pockets of the 1 percent. That is how the American Empire functions.

The New Empire is different. It happens without achieving conquest. The American military did not conquer Iraq and has been forced out politically by the puppet government that Washington established. There is no victory in Afghanistan, and after a decade the American military does not control the country.

In the New Empire success at war no longer matters. The extraction takes place by being at war. Huge sums of American taxpayers’ money have flowed into the American armaments industries and huge amounts of power into Homeland Security. The American empire works by stripping Americans of wealth and liberty.

This is why the wars cannot end, or if one does end another starts. Remember when Obama came into office and was asked what the US mission was in Afghanistan? He replied that he did not know what the mission was and that the mission needed to be defined.

Obama never defined the mission. He renewed the Afghan war without telling us its purpose. Obama cannot tell Americans that the purpose of the war is to build the power and profit of the military/security complex at the expense of American citizens.

This truth doesn’t mean that the objects of American military aggression have escaped without cost. Large numbers of Muslims have been bombed and murdered and their economies and infrastructure ruined, but not in order to extract resources from them.

It is ironic that under the New Empire the citizens of the empire are extracted of their wealth and liberty in order to extract lives from the targeted foreign populations. Just like the bombed and murdered Muslims, the American people are victims of the American empire.


Paul Craig Roberts
for Markets and Money

Ed Note: Paul Craig Roberts was an editor of the Wall Street Journal and an Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury.

From the Archives…

What the News on Bond Yields Say About the “Resolved” Eurozone Crisis
2012-04-13 – Eric Fry

The Art of Selling Stocks
2012-04-12 – Chris Mayer

Misguided Faith in an Economic Recovery
2012-04-11 – Joel Bowman

Beware the Big Government Debt Switcheroo
2012-04-10 – Dan Denning

The Discount Rate: Borrowers, Lenders and Bonds
2012-04-09 – Nick Hubble

Markets and Money offers an independent and critical perspective on the Australian and global investment markets. Slightly offbeat and far from institutional, Markets and Money delivers you straight-forward, humorous, and useful investment insights from a world wide network of analysts, contrarians, and successful investors. Founded in 1999, Markets and Money is published in 7 countries with a worldwide readership of almost 1 million people.

Leave a Reply

7 Comments on "How Empires Really Work"

Notify of
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Dan, a great step seeing Paul Craig Roberts on these pages. One of the most interesting aspects of the past decade is what one might call the coalescence of presience that is developing between the left and paleo conservative right on matters to with imperialism and recognition of the degenerative effect of the entwined emergence of liberal fascism, neocon fasciscm, and zionism. Paul Craig Roberts often tracks the imperial campaigns of the afforementioned groups back from the field where their employed useful idiots are hard at work to the usual crony sources. Like Paul I have a deep interest in… Read more »

Thanks for this article :)


Heh, I was behind a big, gas-guzzling SUV the other day, and it had a bumper sticker that said:

“My country invaded Iraq, and all
I got was this expensive gas”

The potentially sad thing, however, is the thought that the driver actually DID believe he was going to benefit by our ivading Iraq.
Was he being sarcastic? Or was he genuinley dissapointed?


U.S. citizens were also given more money and freedom through higher income and easy credit. This took place for four decades, starting with the Reagan administration, and involved deregulation, tax cuts, and increasing debt across the board. That is, corporate, household, and government debt all increased as more people started borrowing and spending heavily to support the American Dream.

That’s why after Vietnam most citizens didn’t complain about these wars and foreign interventions, and continued voting for government officials who very much did the same things.


Great article. Since I was a School boy in the 1980’s I can recall a middle eastern conflict always being on the news. Why not Asia, Africa or Latin America. A few ago years I figured it out: Oil, Arms & Israel.


only an ignorant could believe that the roman empire does not rule us to this very day;


I tip my hat to you Paul Craig Roberts, the article is spot on. More please. At last, some one is telling it as it is.

Letters will be edited for clarity, punctuation, spelling and length. Abusive or off-topic comments will not be posted. We will not post all comments.
If you would prefer to email the editor, you can do so by sending an email to