In the largest such case ever brought by the US federal government, the Department of Treasury shut down virtual currency provider Liberty Reserve as a ‘primary money laundering concern.’
If you’re not familiar with Liberty Reserve, it was a Costa Rica-based platform that allowed its 1+ million users to convert fiat currency into an online virtual currency that was loosely connected to the financial system.
Users could hold Liberty Reserve Dollars, euros, etc. which were tied to fiat dollars, euros… or even gold. And they could quickly transfer funds across the Liberty Reserve network.
Liberty Reserve’s cardinal sin was not making any effort to validate the identities of its customers. And for this reason, the US government labeled it a ‘primary money laundering concern.’
After all, only criminal terrorists want to bank anonymously.
The charges against Liberty Reserve are vicious, to say the least. The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network claims that the service ‘is not designed for legitimate use’, and that it is ‘designed to facilitate money laundering and illicit finance.’
They go on to list a number of terrorists and criminals who have used Liberty Reserve… because, of course, that’s how they accomplish everything these days – by citing the threat of terrorism.
In fact, the government is deriving its authority to bring charges against Liberty Reserve (and seven of the company’s principals) from a little-known section of the USA PATRIOT Act.
This section, 311, authorizes the US government to blacklist any foreign bank it sees fit from the US financial system. And given that the world still relies heavily on the US financial system for international trade and banking settlement, being cut off from it is fatal.
The biggest issue is what this may mean for Bitcoin…because it certainly does seem to be a huge flashing warning sign that the government is out there targeting digital currencies.
One major difference is that Liberty Reserve was centralized. There was one key platform involved with technology to maintain customer accounts and process payments.
So, to take down Liberty Reserve, they only had to go after a single node.
Bitcoin, on the other hand, is decentralized. Account and transaction data is distributed across the entire user base. There are literally millions of players involved, so it’s a bit of a tougher nut for the government to crack.
But as they’ve already gone after Mt. Gox, the largest Bitcoin exchange site, it certainly follows that they will continue to harass other Bitcoin exchanges… even those that are based outside of the US.
The Liberty Reserve case shows that they’re perfectly willing to use any means available, even citing absurd anti-terrorism legislation, to exceed their jurisdiction and take down their target.
for Markets and Money
Ed Note: This article first appeared here.
From the Archives…
How a Slowing Chinese Economy is About to Hand Australia a Pay-Cut
24-05-13 – Greg Canavan
Your Forefathers’ Pain Can Be Your Gain
23-05-13 – Vern Gowdie
The Fatal Flaw at the Heart of Modern Economics
22-05-13 – Bill Bonner
The Warning Signs for Australia’s Economy
21-05-13 – Greg Canavan
A Simple Interpretation on Gold for Times of Monetary Madness
20-05-13 – Greg Canavan