Peak Dow for Stocks?

Well, the stock market’s having a well-deserved break after motoring ahead recklessly for the past few months. The bulls will take comfort in this. They’ll say a pull-back should not surprise after such a strong run…that it’s ‘healthy’.

Indeed it is. And if you look at a short term chart like the one below of the Dow Jones Industrials index, you couldn’t help but agree. Since bottoming in mid-November 2012 at around 12,500, the Dow has added nearly 1,400 points. That’s an 11% gain in a little over two months. Momentum indicators such as the RSI (top of the chart) and MACD (bottom of the chart) are in ‘overbought’ territory and the index is well above the 200-day moving average (red line).

So time for a pullback, right?

Source: StockCharts
Yep. A good ole pull-back before we’re off to the races again…

But hang on a minute. Let’s change the context with the same chart in a different timeframe. (Don’t you love charts, you can slice them up any way you want to get your point across!) So in that spirit here’s a chart of the Dow Jones Industrial Index over 10 years. Same index, different time frame.

And to make it interesting, it’s a weekly, rather than a daily chart. That is, the data points are weekly rather than daily…which helps to reduce some of the ‘noise’ that comes with long term daily charts.

And here’s what you get…

Source: StockCharts
As you can see, the Dow Jones is bumping up against the highs of 2007. Does this mean anything? Well, it’s a psychological barrier, that’s for sure. Buying stocks at Dow 14,000 in 2007 didn’t turn out so well.

And while we’re not sure that many traders actually remember back to 2007, there must be a few out there who can recall events further back than a few months.

At the very least you can expect some back and forth around this important psychological level. We’re not making any predictions as to which way it will eventually break. But you can be pretty sure that if and when it does punch through that level, it should surge higher again from purely a momentum perspective.

But if it can’t manage to do so…the formation of a ‘double-top’ portends some pretty nasty action ahead.

We’d prefer to sit on the sidelines to watch the outcome. We want no part in the craziness. Economic stagnation and a rising stock market make for strange bedfellows. This weirdness makes us recall a statement made by the world’s pre-eminent physicist of the 18th century, Isaac Newton, after he lost his shirt in the South Sea Bubble:

‘I can calculate the motions of the heavenly bodies, but not the madness of people’

We concur. But what makes this market even more treacherous is that there is no discernible bubble in stock prices based on traditional methods like price-to-earnings ratios. The bubble is in the system itself…in the creation of credit…

It is this vast creation of credit which bubbles to the surface, finding an outlet in various asset markets…junk bonds and other forms of corporate debt, government bonds, blue chip stocks. But little of it finds its way into productive investment. Easy money tends to find an easy use. Genuine investment and productive endeavour are hard.

Greg Canavan
for Markets and Money

Join me on Google Plus
From the Archives…

Shale the Conquering Hero!
25-01-13 – Dan Denning

The Nobel Prize for Quack Economists Like Stiglitz
24-01-13 – Bill Bonner

The Real Story Behind Germany’s Gold Recall
23-01-13 – Byron King

At the Mercy of Financial Repressionists
22-01-13 – Dan Denning

Walter Russell Hall: From Rebellion to Bullion
21-01-13 – Kris Sayce

Greg Canavan

Greg Canavan is a Contributing Editor at Markets & Money and Head of Research at Port Phillip Publishing.

He advocates a counter-intuitive investment philosophy based on the old adage that ‘ignorance is bliss’.

Greg says that investing in the ‘Information Age’ means you now have all the information you need. But is it really useful? Much of it is noise, and serves to confuse rather than inform investors.

Greg Canavan

Latest posts by Greg Canavan (see all)

Leave a Reply

6 Comments on "Peak Dow for Stocks?"

newest oldest most voted
Notify of

Newton has one up on me. I can’t calculate either


I remember the thread a couple of years back now discussing inflation/deflation where I mentioned to Ross that I would not be at all surprised to see the DOW hit 15000.

Sooner or later there are fair chances that gold will rally off its oversold state (rather than flag sideways). It is unlikely the Dow will be allowed to languish in such a time. Plunge protection is real. Granted there are a lot of stops built into that ascending wedge and it will have a fair chance of shaking them out before a breakout of any description….not that it has to. Zombie markets go up and down with little correlation to reality. Free market dynamics will either not play any significant role or else they will totally destroy the system. I… Read more »
@stillgotshoeson if you went very long in 2009 you would be banking that call but the same position in 2010 would have looked less attractive from the financial stock and overall ASX 200 perspective. Revisiting my consumer staples, health and energy services May 2008 entry versus the ASX 200 we look like this today. XJO (ASX 200) -8.1% XEJ (energy) -26.2% XXJ (finance x r/e) +5.4% XHJ (health) +27.1% XNJ (industrials) -28.7% XMJ (materials) -33.2% XPG (property trusts)-43.1% XSJ (consumer staples)+19.0% the most notable recent feature is the bounce in the XXJ taking the ASX 200 up with it… Read more »

“It hasn’t kept pace with the big bank shares in recent months.”

Fearful when others are greedy. Perceived safety, yeild chasing herd mentality at its finest I believe with the recent run to the bank stocks.

I don’t think this will end well for many of them.


The currency war concept is very interesting. Would be good to see links and articles with the good inside info on who is apparently doing what… and how.

Letters will be edited for clarity, punctuation, spelling and length. Abusive or off-topic comments will not be posted. We will not post all comments.
If you would prefer to email the editor, you can do so by sending an email to