Let’s turn our eyes to a gaudy show: today’s financial hurly-burly.
The Dow fell 216 points Monday. Why? We don’t know. Are investors concerned that the Fed will turn off the money machine?
Are they troubled by the ‘sequester‘, which would further squeeze government spending? (This year, Washington is embarking on fiscal tightening of 2% of GDP – one of the biggest budget squeezes in the last century.)
Every day comes news from Washington. Sequester? Compromise? Meat axe? We are getting tired of it. Here’s Reuters:
‘”They’ve rolled out this great political theater about how cutting less than 3% of the federal budget is going to cause all these awful consequences,” said Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, a Republican, on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”
‘”Here’s his chance to say, ‘Here’s how we can do it better,'” Jindal said, suggesting Congress and the White House give departments the ability to cut spending on less essential services.
”Senate Democrats have put forward a plan that focuses on those tax loopholes. This week, Republicans are expected to propose alternatives.
‘”We don’t have any ability with dumb cuts like this to figure out what the right thing to do is,” Education Secretary Arne Duncan said on “Face the Nation.”
‘”There are literally teachers now who are given pink slips, who are given notices that they can’t come back this fall,” Duncan said.
‘Democratic Congressman Eliot Engel agreed that Congress should seek “smart” cuts, rather than across-the-board reductions.
‘”I think Congress should sit down and avoid the sequester,” Engel said on ABC’s “This Week.”
‘”And if the sequester kicks in, for a week or so, we should then fix it so it doesn’t become a permanent thing,” Engel said.’
Blah. Blah. Blah.
And here comes Alan Blinder in The Wall Street Journal. Stop worrying about debt, he says. It’s under control. Sort of.
Blinder says the budget fights in Congress have paid off. The idea from the get-go was to cut $4 trillion from the $10 trillion in additional debt the feds were meant to add over the next 10 years. That was supposed to stabilize federal debt – the portion in the hands of the public – at 73% of GDP.
The Budget Control Act of 2011 chipped off a bit: $1.9 billion, if you believe the forecasters. Then there was the ‘fiscal cliff’ settlement, which took off about $850 billion more. Just 0.6% more to go, he says.
Not only that, but also he says Medicare costs are growing slower than GDP…which is a real feat, since GDP contracted in the last quarter.
So, what do we budget-bankruptcy-and-boondoggle worrywarts have to say about this?
We say it ain’t so.
- Because the budget forecasters presume a return to ‘growth’, which may or may not be so.
- Because they predict that interest rates will remain low, which we know can’t last forever.
- Because they don’t bother to consider the real debt – which takes into account unfunded liabilities, such as pensions – that is growing seven times faster than the official debt.
- Because they completely ignore that the federal budget edifice is erected on the sand of EZ money from the Fed. The central bank is helpfully printing money at almost exactly the same rate that the feds borrow it. When that tide goes out – and it must, sooner or later – it will wash out the foundations under federal finances…and the whole thing will fall down.
It’s not that Blinder is wrong. It’s just that there are other things going on that are likely to make nonsense of his smiley-faced projections.
Of course, only time will tell. And we’ll stand down…and let time tell her story at her own speed.
for Markets and Money
High Tide on Main Street?
22-02-13 – Bill Bonner
The Fed’s Funny Money is Losing its Mojo
21-02-13 – Dan Denning
Resurrecting BHP, the ‘Big Australian’
20-02-13 – Dan Denning
End of the Australian Boom?
19-02-13 – Satyajit Das
Bond Guru Still Likes the Unthinkable: US Treasuries
18-02-13 – Chris Mayer