Sequester Relief and World War D

We finished last Saturday’s Weekend Markets and Money with the idea that a new arms race is brewing between the United States and China. This week it was revealed that US military spending will increase by $22 billion in 2014.

Actually, it’s ‘sequester relief‘. You might remember the fuss about the ‘sequester’ – mandated cuts to US government spending – earlier in the year. In fact, we bet you do. Why? More than anything, it was a media beat up. Plenty of people got spooked. The idea that US federal pork might be taken off the table brought out lobbyists with doomsday predictions for the US economy, the working man and anyone else you care to name.

None of the sequester cuts were over 10% as a percentage of GDP, the annual deficit, total US public debt and the Federal Reserve balance sheet. Chicken feed, in other words. None of it was designed to reduce US government spending on a net basis. It was merely designed to reduce the rate of increase, with one exception – US ‘defence’ spending.  

As you can see, it doesn’t look like that idea will last. Military contractors, if history is any guide, usually feed best from the table of the State. Now they’re first in line for ‘relief’.

As for the working man, former US Assistant Secretary of the Treasury Paul Craig Roberts dissected the US November jobs data this week and estimates US unemployment is 13.2%, not the official 7%, because of the way the numbers are manipulated. Even the jobs being created are ‘mainly the same lowly-paid, part-time, nontradable domestic service jobs that I have been reporting for a decade or longer.‘Economist John Williams of ShadowStats puts the US unemployment at a whopping 23% if you include long term discouraged workers.

However, there’s an unanswered question to all of this: can the increase in US energy output bring lost, higher wage manufacturing jobs back home? Lower input costs are a huge competitive advantage.

[useful_banner_manager banners=3]

In the context of World War D therefore, for how long can the US economy continue to support its huge military? Australia’s stake is a big one here. Over in Scoops Lane this week, Dan Denning went into Australia’s delicate balancing act when it comes to disputes between a rising China and the US.

Dan reported:

 ‘Foreign affairs minister Julie Bishop made her first visit to Beijing last week and was promptly and publicly rebuked for Australia’s position on the Air Defence Identification Zone (ADIZ) in the East China Sea. At a press conference with China’s Wang Yi, Bishop was told that China is ‘deeply dissatisfied’ with Australia’s public criticism of the new ADIZ. Yi elaborated:

‘I have to point out that what Australia has said and done with regard to China’s establishment for the air defence identification zone in the East China Sea has jeopardised bilateral mutual trust and affected the growth of bilateral relations. That is not what we desire to see.’

Bishop politely hit back by saying, ‘We stand by our view.’ But when Chinese imports from Australia have just hit a record high in US dollar terms, and when they’re up 25% year-on-year you can see Australia’s dilemma. Its economic fortunes are tied to China. But it doesn’t want to dance to China’s strategic tune…the even bigger issue is who gets to make the rules about how to organise economic affairs in the Pacific in the future. China senses America’s economic and political weakness. It also senses its own economic strength.’

That strength is going to keep showing up in the Chinese currency, the yuan, if Deutsche Bank is to be believed. CNBC reported this week that the investment bank is on the record predicting the use of the yuan for trade settlement is set to grow 50% to 6 trillion yuan ($988 billion) in 2014. Deutsche Bank also expects the yuan to keep appreciating against the USD, estimating another 2% rise in 2014 after the same amount this year. This when the euro is up 5% for the year, too.

How does the currency war fit into all this? That’s one reason we’re holding World War D. Stay tuned.

Regards,

Callum Newman+
for Markets and Money

Join Markets and Money on Google+

Free report reveals:

Don’t Buy ANY Gold Stocks Until You Read This
Markets & Money Free ReportIn this brand new report, resource expert Jason Stevenson reveals why it’s not the time to buy gold stocks…yet.

Download this free report now and discover:

  • Why the gold ‘bear’ is set to bite again: What goes down, must go…down. As Jason explains, the gold crunch that kicked off in 2011 may not be over after all. In fact, gold’s plunge may be about to ramp up again. Find out why the precious metal could fall well below US$1,000 in the months ahead.
  • The uncut truth on gold: Despite what you might hear, the supply and demand story for gold remains gloomy. But not for much longer. As you’ll see, one specific signals points to a potential bump in demand for the precious metal.
  • Patience the key to big gold gains in 2017: Gold and gold stocks will eventually bounce back. But not right now. Jason reveals when you should jump back into gold, and why patience could pay off big time in the next few years.

To download your copy of Why You Should Wait to Buy Gold Stocks in 2017, take out your free subscription to Markets & Money. Simply enter your email address in the box below and click ‘Send My Free Report’.

We will collect and handle your personal information in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

You can cancel your subscription at any time.

Callum Newman

Callum Newman

Callum Newman is the editor of Markets and Money and Associate Editor of Cycles, Trends and Forecasts.. He also hosts Markets and Money Podcast.

Originally graduating with a degree in Communications, Callum decided financial markets were far more fascinating than anything Marshall McLuhan (the ‘medium is the message’) ever came up with.

Today Callum spends his day reading and researching why currencies, commodities and stocks move like they do. So far he’s discovered it’s often in a way you least expect.

To have Callum’s thoughts and insights on the current state of the currency, commodities and stock markets delivered straight to your inbox, take out a free subscription to Markets and Money here.

To receive Callum’s other financial eletter Cycles, Trends and Forecasts you’ll need to be a subscriber. You can do so here.

Official websites and financial eletters Callum writes for:

If you think Callum’s financial world view and investing style closely matches your own, or is something you’d like to know more about — then don’t hesitate to join his Google+ profile.

Doing so will give you the following advantages:

  • You’ll have a snapshot overview of when Callum has new articles published online so you can keep track of his investment ideas and financial world view more closely.
  • It will allow you to follow items of interest Callum highlights on the web which he feels are important for investors to take note of — and that he can’t always fit into his regular eletters.
  • You’ll be made aware of when he’s speaking at investment conferences or attending exclusive events that could help broaden and enhance your investment outlook.
  • You’ll be able to show support for his articles and financial world view by ‘+1ing’ anything he writes, as well as see recommendations by other people within your circles of interest who may share a similar outlook to your own.

If you don’t already have a Google+ account, you can start one here.

You can also join him on Twitter here @CallumRN

To read more insights by Callum check out the articles below.

Read more

Leave a Reply

3 Comments on "Sequester Relief and World War D"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Bender
Guest

Where can I buy stocks in canned food & shotguns?

Ross
Guest
if the South China Sea territorial claims rested upon international law, Japan’s case is as weak as dishwater. http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-japanese-militarism-and-chinas-air-defense-identification-zone-adiz-over-disputed-islets-pretext-for-another-pacific-war/5360593 There are thousands of narrative factory academic and media commentators writing up sop to the contrary. The ICJ were once considered fairly credible but there has been more than a whiff of activism in respect of the Honduras, Nicuagara, Columbia maritime ruling that may be a stalking horse for the South China Sea…. We’ve got a narrative factory process worker on the case of course, Professor Warwick Gullett – Dean of Law, University of Wollongong. Great power politics trumps law and… Read more »
Ross
Guest

Here is your post GFC recovery bottled, from Doug Noland:

“In 21 quarters, GDP increased 17% ($2.393TN) to $16.891 TN. Over this period, Treasury debt jumped 128% ($6.706 TN) to $11.957 TN. Federal Liabilities have increased 135% ($9.012 TN) to $15.710 TN. In 21 quarters, Federal Liabilities surged from 46% to 93% of GDP. Over this period, State & Local Liabilities jumped 76% ($2.127 TN) to $4.940 TN. Combined Federal and State & Local Liabilities have increased from 66% of GDP to 122% in 21 quarters. Over this period, Federal Reserve Assets have expanded $2.835 TN, or 298%, to $3.787 TN.”

wpDiscuz
Letters will be edited for clarity, punctuation, spelling and length. Abusive or off-topic comments will not be posted. We will not post all comments.
If you would prefer to email the editor, you can do so by sending an email to letters@marketsandmoney.com.au