Superannuation Raiding Party Being Formed II

What a fragile thing economic confidence is. Investors are just starting to get the feel of rising stock prices again, like putting on an old pair of comfortable jeans you’ve found in the bottom of the hamper. Perhaps they should be laundered first, though.

But this is a stock market rally you must handle with care. Last week’s close on the Dow saw that psychologically important index erase its losses for the year. After being down as much as 25% in mid-March, the Dow-led last week by soaring energy stocks-has lifted into the black again. So where to now?

Well, confidence cannot repair a balance sheet. Only reducing debt over time can do that. But there is a whole raft of data this week that will tell us if the economy truly has turned the corner. We reckon it has, but that there’s another sharper corner ahead. Buckle up. And maybe slow down.

In the U.S., manufacturing data comes out this week. Industrial production in the world’s largest economy has fallen sixteen out of the last seventeen months. Many economists will tell you it can’t get worse. Unless, that is, the U.S. (like a lot of the Western world) is in a long decline in which the entire economy becomes less productive. If that’d the case, what difference does a month make?

For financial markets-especially credit markets-the bigger number will probably be U.S. housing starts. For some odd reason, there are a lot of people who think builders are going to start building again even though U.S. housing inventories are ample (and mortgage rates are rising, reducing demand anyway.)

But it’s a wacky world out there. For instance, the Commonwealth Bank raised the interest rate on its variable rate mortgage loans over the weekend 5.74%. It says it may raise its fixed rate too. And other banks may well follow. This is probably not what the government expected when it engineered a 0.5% increase in first quarter GDP.

However there’s a growing gap between the RBA’s cash rate of 3% and what Aussie banks are paying to borrow in the whole sale market. In other words, whether its inflation fears or anticipating a recovery, interest rates are moving up. The banks are simply adjusting to what the futures markets are already predicting.

This unwelcome development for housing finance makes tomorrow’s release of the notes from the last RBA morning that much more interesting. If the RBA doesn’t show an easing bias-if instead it confirms the inflation fears-it’s going to be hard to blame the banks for hiking up rates now (even though unemployment is still rising and the rate rises are especially bad for the Aussie housing market).

When you add it all up-just the appearances and hunches and sentiment-we get the feeling that the momentum in stocks may carry indexes higher by another 3-5%, and then a correction. If you’re sitting on gains from the last few months, you may want to pay special attention to the analysis below from Swarm Trader Gabriel Andre.

In a Friday update, the Swarm Trader showed in a chart what we’d only suspected. Namely, to be on the watch for a correction. “There is very little doubt,” he wrote to subscribers, “that the Index will reach the level of 4,200 points soon, probably next week. This target is just a bit more than 3% higher than today’s closing price. Because of the technical resistance (valid since November 2007) and because of overbought indicators, a correction is likely to quickly follow. In a first time, the level of 3,900 points may be the first intermediary support.”

Technical Resistance on the ASX/200 at 4,200

Click to Enlarge

What happens after that? Who knows? We’ll keep you posted on Gabriel’s research. He’s lately been applying it to finding entry and exit points for stocks listed on the ASX/200. Meanwhile, his technical indicators continue to producer shorter-term trading opportunities as well. He’s a busy man.

Did we really mean to say the government is trying to steal your superannuation savings by making a deal with the fund industry? Well, sort of. Super assets represent a huge pool of capital that manages to generate fee income for an entire industry. The government also sees that money as a source of funding for its infrastructure and other plans.

It’s important to remember that Super is a tax scheme too. Even though the contributions are compulsory, you don’t have to channel it all into stocks. In fact, based on some of the long-term trends we profiled last week, we think investors will have to start thinking about other ways to make, grow, and keep income in the coming years. The stock market will not be enough.

We asked Kris Sayce-who’s been leading up the research into more income and safety in your super-what he thought of last’ week’s news. His reply is below. Stay tuned for more on this subject in the coming weeks.

Kris writes that, “There will be a new ‘Super Govt Aged Pension’ that will allow you to give-up your existing super balance in return for defined benefit based on the existing balance plus any future super contributions you make. You’ll still pay the 9% super guarantee except it will have to go to a special government fund – perhaps they could call it the Future Fund… except that name’s already taken!

“The other level will be to make the ‘default’ funds for fund managers one which includes ‘infrastructure’ funds. This would be easy as all funds have a range of minimum and maximum levels for specific investments. Another way will be to increase the super guarantee from 9% to 15%… the unions and super industry are in favour of this, plus it wouldn’t be a tough sell to the electorate as very few people consider this as being a tax, which it would become, even more of as your ability to have control over your super is diminished.

Hmm. Higher compulsory contributions with less control of your money. Sounds like something you’d want to avoid or at least plan for, doesn’t it?

“Finally,” writes Kris, “the tax and regulatory rules for SMSF will be made so onerous that it will be unattractive for people to open an SMSF. I read something recently that stated SMSF investors needed more ‘education’ on how to run their fund, etc… In other words it will mean increased costs for accounting, auditing, training, reporting, and legal.

“Before and after these changes I expect an increase in the number of audits by the ATO on SMSF that will comprise a scare campaign -‘Look at these investors, they’ve been fined $X for not do this, or they’ve gone to jail for doing that – do you really want to risk it? Why not take out a Super Govt Aged Pension instead?’ There will be very little resistance to these changes especially now when the market is low and when the public is becoming more and more indoctrinated into receiving government support!”

O brave new world with such wealth-stealing in it. What should an investor or a free man do? More on that tomorrow.

Dan Denning
for Markets and Money

Dan Denning
Dan Denning examines the geopolitical and economic events that can affect your investments domestically. He raises the questions you need to answer, in order to survive financially in these turbulent times.

Leave a Reply

10 Comments on "Superannuation Raiding Party Being Formed II"

Notify of
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Charles  Norville
Look we need to nationalise public super, it actually is money largely tax depreciated and Govt clearly has vested interest. But all State & Local Govt super as well needs to be pooled as well this can be the source of rebuilding our nation with pension bonds, up to 30 years as well current fully funded Fed pension liabilities, we should not be selling bonds overseas unless we have no choice. If we trust the world with our super money it will vaporise, we should fire sale overseas super assets immediately. History has shown that Aus is the end user… Read more »
Charles…really? Trust the Gov. to manage your super? And not completely waste it on stupid things? (Bailout anyone? More Navy boats? How about 20,000 more?) The more things that are controlled by Gov, the more problems we will have. The Gov. simply does not know how to spend money well. Surely we can’t give them even more? Although it concerns me that some ASX companies may benefit hugely from super investment – what if you take that away? Personally I don’t like the idea of super anyway. People should learn to manage their own retirement, and for those that don’t,… Read more »

Surprise surprise surprise! This comes as absolutely no shock to me. As I have said before we will end up having a “balance” in A government fund account which entitles you to a certain pension when you retire. No more lump sums buddy because there will be no money in the account to cover it. With respect to SMSF I will use an expression beloved by the NRA – “you can have my SMSF when you pry it from my cold dead fingers.” oh wait – that is the intention dam!

In reality it wont be very hard to take out the SMSF. All they need to do is to pick some arbitrary number – say 8% returns PA – and require that the SMSF demonstrate that they match or exceed this figure over a certain time period. If they don’t they get wound up and the cash goes into the Government fund, after all they will point out that to allow these funds to lose money or go below this rate will only result in the government having to pick up the slack when that person retires with insufficient funds.… Read more »

Gabriel’s analysis of the XJO or whatever it is, the image is not working.


I lived for some years in Germany and came to understand that the only thing that had kept their rentenversicherung scheme running was the fact that at that time German men would retire and then promptly die. No lump sums there and the wife would then get a reduced pension paid out of a principal that would end its days returned to the treasury. The trouble since then has been that German men, post the Adenauer years, have been getting increasingly less bound up in the idea of killing themselves at the work chaingang, urlaub has started to be a… Read more »
Biker Pete

Yes, it’s a Norville idea, Charles. Every post in this particular forum convinces me to _take it now_ and buy tangibles. As the man said: “Keep yer grubby hands off my tangibles!”

James Zhang

Sorry about that guys. I’ve fixed the image and it’s now working.

Happy reading,


Biker Pete
Has the GFC affected rural Australia? Here’s one old cocky’s take on it: It all started back in 1966 when we changed from pounds to dollars. That doubled me bloody overdraft. Then they brought in kilograms instead of pounds. Me bloody wool clip dropped by half! After that, they changed rain to millimetres and we haven’t had an inch of rain since. If that wasn’t enough, they brought in Celsius, and it never got over 40 degrees…. no wonder me bloody wheat won’t grow. Then they changed acres to hectares, and I ended up with only half the land I… Read more »
Charles  Norville
There’s is this plaque in IOUSA or The Corporation doco, something like “don’t steal from the Government….they don’t like competition’ and sure Govt have stuffed things, they give you these little pencils to ‘us slaves with a vote’, on voting day to mark the X’s in boxes, that’s so we can’t stab a pollie in the neck if they dare show up at a polling booth. But we indeed need to guarantee a safe and reasonable retirement to those Aus that have worked hard, pensions should vary according to the input of super….pollies, judges etc should not get special privileges,… Read more »
Letters will be edited for clarity, punctuation, spelling and length. Abusive or off-topic comments will not be posted. We will not post all comments.
If you would prefer to email the editor, you can do so by sending an email to