Want to Take a Punt on the Medibank Private Float? Read this first.

Want to Take a Punt on the Medibank Private Float? Read this first.

Today is Cup Day.

It’s a public holiday here in Victoria…and it’s bordering on that in most of the other states. I lived in Sydney through many Melbourne Cup days, and by the afternoon the pubs were full and offices all but empty.

Not exactly productivity enhancing behaviour. But that’s alright — we’ve backed China’s economy and property to bring us prosperity. In a sprint, that’s not a bad bet. In a staying race, it’s a 100-1 shot. In case you didn’t know, the Melbourne Cup is a staying race.

Anyway, today’s Markets and Money comes to you in the spirit of having a punt. First up, there’s some brief analysis of the Medibank Private float. I sent it to subscribers of Sound Money. Sound Investments. last week. It mainly focusses on whether the offer is good value or not.

In short, the company looks like a good one. But the pricing is outrageous. Punters don’t even know what price they will end up paying if they apply for shares. If you want to have a punt on stag profits, understand that is exactly what it is…a punt.

The second article today is from an old mate of mine, Jason McIntosh. I’ve been working with him for the past six months on a new project. You’ll hear about it shortly. In his essay below, Jason recounts what it was like the first time he stepped onto a trading floor fresh out of uni.

For some, the trading floor of a global investment bank is a punters’ paradise. But Jason discovered a different set of traders who weren’t manic punters. They crunched the numbers and made sure the odds were on their side.

They weren’t punters…they were the house.

Read on below for Jason’s story.

But first, the Medibank float. As you probably know, Australian retail investors have up until 14 November to apply for shares. The stock lists on the ASX on Tuesday, 25 November.
The indicative price range for the shares has been set at $1.55 to $2.00 per share.

At the indicative price range, the market capitalisation of Medibank would be $4.26–$5.508 billion, which places it among the top 100 companies on the ASX.

The business is a decent one. Based on forecasts for 2015, Medibank will generate a return on equity (ROE) of 18.5%. This is only just below the 19.5% ROE forecast for competitor NIB Holdings.

The problem here is the price. I am recommending you do not take part in the Medibank Private offer on the basis of the asking price.

Let me explain…

First, when you apply for the shares, you don’t know what you’ll actually pay. The stock may cost you $1.55 per share or it may cost $2. Based on the interest in the offer, my guess is that the company will come onto the market closer to $2.

At this price range and based on earnings projections for the 2015 financial year ($258.2 million), Medibank will trade on a price-to-earnings multiple of between 16.5 and 21.3 times. That’s quite high for a mature company operating in a competitive marketplace.

The price to book (P/B) value will be between 3.06 and 3.95 times, which is also high. To see why this is the case, take a look at this calculation based on a rough rule of thumb that I use:

The P/B tells you what multiple the market puts on a company’s shareholder equity. As a general rule, the higher a company’s ROE, the higher the P/B should be.

To obtain a rough guide of the return the business will generate for you given the price you will pay, divide the ROE by the P/B.

In this case, it’s:

18.4% divided by 3.06 = 6.01%

18.4% divided by 3.95 = 4.66%

In other words, given the earnings forecasts, the business owner will generate between 4.66% and 6.01% annually, depending on the final price paid.

This is a rough guide only, as it doesn’t take into account reinvested earnings and balance sheet growth, but it’s still a decent indication that the sellers are taking advantage of an expensive market to sell into.

They’re getting a good price…the buyers not so much.

Needless to say, I think those numbers represent a poor risk/reward trade off. It’s important to note also that Medibank generates more than 20% of operational earnings from market-linked investments. Like other insurers, Medibank invests the premiums it receives in financial assets like bonds and equities.

When the markets do well, good investment returns bolster overall profits. But when markets aren’t doing well, profits will take a hit. This aspect of the business clearly increases the risk profile.

To make the investment work for the new owners, you’ll want to see Medibank generate much better returns on equity in the future. That could happen, but it’s operating in a highly competitive environment and is already making decent returns.

Of course, this analysis ignores what the market (as opposed to the business) can do upon listing. There may be additional demand for shares from pension and index funds, which could push the price higher. Those getting in at the float price may get an opportunity to make ‘stag’ profits.

While that is a possibility, I see any price boost as being short lived. This offer is an expensive one and given you won’t even know the price you pay (which could range from $1.55 to $2), I recommend steering clear.

Greg Canavan,
For Markets and Money

Greg Canavan

Greg Canavan is a Contributing Editor at Markets & Money and Head of Research at Port Phillip Publishing.

He advocates a counter-intuitive investment philosophy based on the old adage that ‘ignorance is bliss’.

Greg says that investing in the ‘Information Age’ means you now have all the information you need. But is it really useful? Much of it is noise, and serves to confuse rather than inform investors.

Greg Canavan

Latest posts by Greg Canavan (see all)

Leave a Reply

2 Comments on "Want to Take a Punt on the Medibank Private Float? Read this first."

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
slewie the pi-rat
the NEW climate change documents have been published by IPCC. see? http://ipcc.ch/ i have reviewed the 40pp-long “approved summary for policymakers” via the “Synthesis Report”. now i did skim it, so i might have missed a thing or three, HOWEVER, there still does not seem to have dawned upon any of these “scientists” that nuclear energy could be adding heat to the planet. not one degree of heat, ever, from nuclear which has now been a-cookin’ for 75 years, at least. and, although water vapor is a heat-trapping gas carrying ~500 cal/GRAM, there is no mention of it, that i… Read more »
Harry VanDerHoek

I may not be as smart as you but I believe we should take Global warming serious. What if they are right what do we stand to loose If investments go into renewables instead of coal?

Letters will be edited for clarity, punctuation, spelling and length. Abusive or off-topic comments will not be posted. We will not post all comments.
If you would prefer to email the editor, you can do so by sending an email to letters@marketsandmoney.com.au