Will the Latest Data From China Cause a Rally in Aussie Stocks?

China’s economic macro data published last week in Beijing set the table for another major round of economic stimulus by the Chinese government. Now there’s good reason to doubt whether that stimulus will do anything useful. But remember, last time China went all in on intervention in 2009, it marked the beginning of a rally in Aussie stocks and commodity prices. There’s a lot at stake here, in other words.

Does the latest economic data on China justify more aggressive intervention by the Communist Party of China? Well, consumer prices are only rising at 1.8% per year, according to official statistics. That means the government can spend more money without worrying about the social instability created by rising fuel and food prices, at least for now.

Dig a little deeper and you’ll see that fixed asset investment grew at 20.4% in the last twelve months. That’s slower than average. And fixed asset investment is the best measurement of government infrastructure and building projects that generate demand for Australian resources. Investment — government and otherwise — has been one of the big engines of Chinese GDP growth over the last twenty years.

Of course the other big engine is exports. On Friday, we learned Chinese exports grew at just 1% year-over-year in July. That was down from 11.3% in June. If exports aren’t consistently firing, then job creation and social stability are threatened. All of this macro data on China adds up to some combination of lower interest rates, lower bank reserve requirement rations, and higher government spending ahead.

Whether those measures will create a rally in stocks is a different story. The story of the last three years is that each new government intervention into the market creates smaller and shorter rallies. The first few hits of quantitative easing lowered rates and moved money out of ‘safe’ assets into ‘risk assets’.

But investors are wise to the trick now. You can punish savers by driving down rates. You can force investors to become speculators. But you can’t force people to take economic activity that they know in their bones is a fraud. Well, you can probably force some of them. But not all of them.

Our suggestion to you is to not be one of them. By ‘them’, we mean those investors who are duped into believing you can create prosperity by spending money you don’t have. From Europe to America, you’re going to get a lot of that in the political silly season. It will be hard to resist the temptation to get back in. If you must go in, do so as a stock trader.

Speaking of which, tomorrow in Sydney we’re going to ask Currency Wars author Jim Rickards what he thinks of the Australian dollar. At the Vancouver conference we recently attended, the Aussie dollar was a favourite of many of our friends. Even on slower China growth, they see the Aussie as a new safe haven currency. Does Rickards agree? Inquiring minds want to know…


Dan Denning

From the Archives…

When the Trickle Becomes a Flood
10-08-2012 – Greg Canavan

What Central Planners Can Never Know
09-08-2012 – Bill Bonner

The Central Bank Big Bazooka in Theory and Practice
08-08-2012 – Bill Bonner

In Thrall to the Iron Fist
07-08-2012 – Dan Denning

Cracks in the Foundation
06-08-2012 – Dan Denning

Dan Denning
Dan Denning examines the geopolitical and economic events that can affect your investments domestically. He raises the questions you need to answer, in order to survive financially in these turbulent times.

Leave a Reply

1 Comment on "Will the Latest Data From China Cause a Rally in Aussie Stocks?"

Notify of
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
The engines of growth that developed China from the 80’s onwards were western consumer markets. Chinese export infrastructure building speculation proved to be a fairly accurate bow wave for western consumerism for a long time even as Chinese entrepeneurialism and central plannning shared the space. If you called this “Keynesianism on the front foot” the average Chinese would still say you were doing the party, and Chinese generally, a disservice. Chinese party cronyism and princeling power were probably less worse than that practiced by western elites and regimes in that same period (in any case the Chinese have at least… Read more »
Letters will be edited for clarity, punctuation, spelling and length. Abusive or off-topic comments will not be posted. We will not post all comments.
If you would prefer to email the editor, you can do so by sending an email to letters@dailyreckoning.com.au