Does the Australian Economy Have the Stomach for Reform?

Does the Australian Economy Have the Stomach for Reform?

I’ve put in a request to have your daily email renamed ‘Ye Olde Markets and Money’. That’s because of my quaint and doltish focus on data like the trade balance, things that don’t really matter anymore but are still fun to monitor.

Yesterday, the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) released trade data for the month of May…and it was a shocker. Instead of an expected deficit of $200 million, it came in at a whopping $1.9 billion. Following a series of surpluses in the early part of the year, this is the second monthly deficit and will drag down second quarter economic growth unless we see a big turnaround in June (unlikely after the big falls in the iron ore price).

The Australian stock market certainly didn’t care about the trade deficit. It surged higher yesterday on…we’re not sure what…probably short covering. In the past three weeks we’ve had three such vicious rallies, all of which ran out of steam pretty quickly. Will this one be different?

Phillip J Anderson, Port Phillip Publishing’s newest recruit, no doubt doesn’t care about quaint notions like trade balances either. Phil looks at cycles, and he couldn’t care less what happens in the meantime.

I’ve just finished his first issue, and it’s an intriguing read. For Phil, it’s all about the real estate cycle. The monetisation of land value via debt is the key to understanding how these cycles work.

‘The land market, and the credit created against it, is what drives the real estate cycle, which drives the economy, which ultimately drives stocks and property. If you do not understand the land market, then you are blind to the risks you are taking when you invest.

‘At the very heart of the real estate cycle, chasing the unearned wealth that is the economic rent drives most real estate investment (speculation). The banks love this process. Banks capture this economic rent via mortgage payments — creating credit against the land price. Land price, is, in reality, the capitalised annual rental value of the land.

‘This means banks have become a far larger (now enormous) part of the economy than they otherwise should be. We are, in effect, mortgaging the earth to them. It’s a very profitable system for those who control it.’

Until they blow it up, which they inevitably do. Phil reckons the next explosion isn’t due for a while, so get on board. If you’re interested in Phil’s ideas, click here.

But let’s get back to Ye Olde Markets and Money, and wring our hands over old-fashioned notions like economic prosperity and budget sustainability.

Funnily enough, the old pugilist Mark Latham got me thinking about this after reading his piece in the Financial Review today. Latham points out that in life, as in markets, people think the past is prologue.

‘In public opinion, it is widely assumed the economy is running itself and our future prosperity is guaranteed. No matter how frantically governing parties ramp up their rhetoric about the importance of economic management, few people are listening.’

In other words, we’ve had it too good for too long. This is not a new claim. But Latham makes the point to introduce a new essay by former Rudd economics adviser Andrew Charlton called Dragon’s Tail. Charlton says we’ve been enjoying a ’precarious sort of prosperity’…the result of a big fat Chinese credit boom that resulted in a huge misallocation of (our) resources.

Now, the Dragon’s Tail could come back to smack us in the face. The upshot of Charlton’s essay is that we need a major period of microeconomic reform…something the electorate is just not up for.

Well, what you want and what you get are sometimes two different things. The government understands the predicament, but don’t know how to implement reform without getting the electorate’s nose out of joint. That’s because we’ve got a bozo in charge of things, a leader that the Australian public has no intention of following, at least not closely.

So what do you do when your leader can’t sell an unpalatable future? You push an unelected bureaucrat up to the podium to have a crack…

That’s what happened yesterday when Treasury Secretary Dr Martin Parkinson gave a speech at a mining conference in Perth. He used the occasion to basically say Australia’s economy is moving into a low growth phase, and unless we reform our taxation system, things are going to get worse.

In the past decade or so, poor productivity has not impacted our ability to grow incomes. But that happy phase is now over:

‘Despite a significant slowdown in productivity growth, average incomes in Australia have grown at among the highest rates of OECD countries over the past decade. That’s largely due to the rising terms of trade and associated appreciation of the exchange rate.

‘We can no longer rely on rising terms of trade as a source of income growth. In addition, the ageing of the population will place downward pressure on income growth from increasing workforce participation.

‘In the medium term, income growth will therefore largely be determined by our success in raising our productivity.’

Dr Parkinson reckons that if labour productivity grows at its long run average, future income growth will be just 1% per annum, half of what we have become accustomed to.

So we need to work on productivity growth. How do we do that? Reform…starting with taxation reform.

‘It is hard to overstate the need for reforming the tax system. If our public finances are not placed on a sustainable footing, tax reform becomes more difficult as time passes.

‘Our tax mix is heavily weighted toward direct taxes on income — personal and corporate. If we were to leave our tax rates and bases as they are, our reliance on income taxes would grow over time.’

Ken Henry provided a good basis for taxation reform back in 2010. The government at the time ignored all the proposals, and twisted the proposed resource rent tax into the bungled super profits tax. The one the current government just got rid of it. What a debacle…

Do we have the stomach for reform? I’m guessing we don’t. Australia’s economy is too caught up in the myth that debt = wealth to care about the serious long term issues that face the country. As a proud Aussie, I’m increasingly disillusioned with where this country is heading.

More than likely, Australia will have some sort of crisis before the wider population realises the magnitude of the hole that we’re digging for ourselves.

Only then will we realise what is going on. And at that point the job will be so much harder.


Greg Canavan
for Markets and Money

Join Markets and Money on Google+

Greg Canavan

Greg Canavan is a Contributing Editor at Markets & Money and Head of Research at Port Phillip Publishing.

He advocates a counter-intuitive investment philosophy based on the old adage that ‘ignorance is bliss’.

Greg says that investing in the ‘Information Age’ means you now have all the information you need. But is it really useful? Much of it is noise, and serves to confuse rather than inform investors.

Greg Canavan

Latest posts by Greg Canavan (see all)

Leave a Reply

6 Comments on "Does the Australian Economy Have the Stomach for Reform?"

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Greg, I’m increasingly disillusioned as well, Is it that the Australian people don’t have the stomach for it or the Australian banks are making billions out of the negative gearing property speculation status quo? Judging by Joe Hockey’s comments today that we don’t need a royal commission into CBA I’m guessing the banks have just as much to do with it. How can we change the tax system in any meaningful way without unraveling the property market? I feel more and more each day that we are living in a Neo Feudal world with the big four now the new… Read more »
The Australian public is too much in debt and far too materialistic to stomach reforms of any kind. Worse is we have as the nation’s leader a man whith limited knowledge of economics. His predicessor was even worse, thinking that Australia will remain prosperous by grovelling, bowing and scraping at the feet of aging old China. I remember hearing the Labour Party idiots saying in 2008 that the mining boom will last 50 years. With Liberal in charge it will be everyone who is not rich to cary the burdon of any limited reforms they undertake to strengthen the Australian… Read more »
slewie the pi-rat

“It is hard to overstate the need for reforming the tax system. If our public finances are not placed on a sustainable footing, tax reform becomes more difficult as time passes.” [M. Parkinson]

but, but,… what about the can-kicking?


All businesses need at least three things: space to operate (real estate), electricity, and water. All three of these things have been driven up to insane unsustainable prices by the Liberal/Labor banksters. One wonders how they think they are going to sustain real-estate prices with businesses closing and people losing their jobs at an exponentially increasing rate.

Being a Pensioner myself (and my wife as she is in a wheelchair), I would like to work but can only do a little because I am a carer. So if employers can offer more part-time work like 10+/-2 hours per week, maybe we can get out of this hole we are digging for ourselves. Those hours would earn us about $120-240/week. We would start to pay Tax again after our working credits were used up. We could subscribe to Very Good Financial Advice on how to invest from a very low base and Pay more Taxes through CGT. As… Read more »

Falling productivity is a direct result of falling EROEI. Peak oil mates, peak oil. Depopulate or perish.

Letters will be edited for clarity, punctuation, spelling and length. Abusive or off-topic comments will not be posted. We will not post all comments.
If you would prefer to email the editor, you can do so by sending an email to