The First Shot in the War on Cash?

Cash machine queue

‘The first shot in the War on Cash?’

The headline caught our attention. We’d just finished researching and writing about the ‘Deep State’ for the latest issue of our monthly publication, The Bill Bonner Letter.

This is something you’re likely to hear more about. The Deep State describes the way the US government really works, rather than the way it’s supposed to work.

Over the years — hardly noticed by the press or the public — a group of insiders has taken control of Washington.

Some of them are familiar government hacks and politicians. Some, largely anonymous, are in the private sector. And some represent foreign governments, foreign businesses (notably banks), and foreign organisations.

These zombies and cronies — who number in the thousands — have much more power and authority than 100 million voters. Research shows that if they want legislation, they get it.

Voters, on the other hand, get what they want only rarely…and probably only because the insiders want the same thing.

The insiders get the money, too. The tens of trillions of dollars diverted into boondoggle bailouts, QE, and ZIRP, for example — they had to go to someone.

And now the Deep State is setting itself up to get even more…

Two kinds of ‘cash’

Dr. Matthew Partridge in our London office reports for MoneyWeek magazine that a small Swiss bank has become the first retail bank in the world to charge customers negative interest on their deposits.

A number of central banks — including the Swiss National Bank — have already taken benchmark interest rates below zero. But, beginning next year, Alternative Bank Schweiz (ABS) will be the world’s first bank to pass those negative rates on to customers.

In a letter to its customers, ABS said it would charge account holders 0.125% a year to hold their ‘cash’ deposits to protect its profit margins. And anyone with 100,000 Swiss francs ($97,316) or more on deposit will have to pay 0.75% a year.

Let’s stop here for a moment and clarify…

There are ‘cash deposits’ and there is ‘cash.’ Cash deposits are an oxymoron. If you say you have cash in the bank, you are mistaken.

The bank doesn’t really hold ‘your’ cash. It owes you money. If it goes broke, you’ll stand in line with other creditors to get it (subject to whatever guarantees may be in place…and however well they may work).

Cash in hand is different. It is physical. Paper. You can do what you want with it. And you don’t pay a negative interest rate.

Which is why the feds want to ban cash…

They say it will make it easier for them to stimulate the economy.

As long as you can hold physical cash, you have an easy way to escape negative interest rates: you just take the money out of the bank and put it in your home safe.

But if physical cash is illegal, you have no choice. You have to keep ‘your money’ on deposit at the bank…and take whatever negative rate the bank imposes on you.

How to Know if a SMSF is Right For You…

Markets & Money Free Report

Is a self-managed super fund right for YOU?

In this special Markets and Money report, award-winning wealth manager, Vern Gowdie shows you how to set one up…avoid dodgy advice…and choose the right investments.

PLUS you’ll get Markets and Money every weekday…absolutely free.

Enter your email address below and hit the ‘Claim My Free Report’ button now.

We will collect and handle your personal information in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

You can cancel your subscription at any time.

Total control

Of course, the idea that taking away your money will stimulate economic growth is ridiculous.

As former banker, hedge fund manager, and expert on the fiat money system Warren Mosler recently told Bonner & Partners Investor Network subscribers:

First, central bankers have got the interest rate thing backward. They think lowering rates will somehow stimulate the economy.

But negative interest rates are just a tax. You start off with a certain amount of money — say, $100. If the rate is negative 1%, then you have $99 at the end of a year.

Isn’t there some theory that says when people’s money goes away, and they have less, they spend less?

If negative rates don’t really encourage spending, why bother?

This brings us to the real danger of banning cash…and perhaps the real reason the feds want to do it — more control.

Reports William N. Griggs at The Free Thought Project under the headline ‘Drone Pilots have Bank Accounts and Credit Cards Frozen by Feds for Exposing US Murder’:

For having the courage to come forward and expose the drone program for the indiscriminate murder that it is, four vets are under attack from the government they once served.

The US Government failed to deter them through threats of criminal prosecution, and clumsy attempts to intimidate their families. Now, four former Air Force drone operators-turned-whistleblowers have had their credit cards and bank accounts frozen, according to human rights attorney Jesselyn Radack.

“My drone operators went public this week and now their credit cards and bank accounts are frozen,” Radack lamented on her Twitter feed. This was done despite the fact that none of them has been charged with a criminal offense — “but this is a trivial formality in the increasingly Sovietesque American National Security State.”’

If we are forced to keep our money in the bank…and cash is outlawed…the Deep State will have total economic control over us all.


Bill Bonner,

For Markets and Money, Australia

Join Markets and Money on Google+

Bill Bonner

Bill Bonner

Best-selling investment author Bill Bonner is the founder and president of Agora Publishing, one of the world's most successful consumer newsletter companies. Owner of both Fleet Street Publications and MoneyWeek magazine in the UK, he is also author of the free daily e-mail Markets and Money.
Bill Bonner

Latest posts by Bill Bonner (see all)

Leave a Reply

Be the First to Comment!

Notify of
Letters will be edited for clarity, punctuation, spelling and length. Abusive or off-topic comments will not be posted. We will not post all comments.
If you would prefer to email the editor, you can do so by sending an email to